Back

Integration of Multiple Spatial-Omics Modalities Reveals Unique Insights into Molecular Heterogeneity of Prostate Cancer

Zhang, W.; Spotbeen, X.; Vanuytven, S.; Kint, S.; Sarretto, T.; Socciarelli, F.; Vandereyken, K.; Dehairs, J.; Idkowiak, J.; Wouters, D.; Alvira Larizgoitia, J. I.; Partel, G.; Ly, A.; de Laat, V.; Q. Mantas, M. J.; Gevaert, T.; Devlies, W.; Mah, C. Y.; Butler, L. M.; Loda, M.; Joniau, S.; De Moor, B.; Sifrim, A.; Ellis, S. R.; Voet, T.; Claesen, M.; Verbeeck, N.; Swinnen, J. V.

2023-08-28 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.08.28.555056 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent advances in spatial omics methods are revolutionising biomedical research by enabling detailed molecular analyses of cells and their interactions in their native state. As most technologies capture only a specific type of molecules, there is an unmet need to enable integration of multiple spatial-omics datasets. This, however, presents several challenges as these analyses typically operate on separate tissue sections at disparate spatial resolutions. Here, we established a spatial multi-omics integration pipeline enabling co-registration and granularity matching, and applied it to integrate spatial transcriptomics, mass spectrometry-based lipidomics, single nucleus RNA-seq and histomorphological information from human prostate cancer patient samples. This approach revealed unique correlations between lipids and gene expression profiles that are linked to distinct cell populations and histopathological disease states and uncovered molecularly different subregions not discernible by morphology alone. By its ability to correlate datasets that span across the biomolecular and spatial scale, the application of this novel spatial multi-omics integration pipeline provides unprecedented insight into the intricate interplay between different classes of molecules in a tissue context. In addition, it has unique hypothesis-generating potential, and holds promise for applications in molecular pathology, biomarker and target discovery and other tissue-based research fields.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.