Effects of Specific Protective Resources on the Burnout Levels of Selected Visayan Medical Students from Online-Based Education during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
Arpilleda, J. J.; Bunal, J. P.; Montano, M. T.; Torrenueva, L. M.; Acebes, M. J.; Homecillo, M.; Salvador, J. P.; Tan, F. G.; Villanueva, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundBurnout is a phenomenon characterized as a consistent state of being exhausted physically, mentally, and emotionally. Grit, tolerance for ambiguity, religiosity, and social support are protective factors that may mitigate burnout and improve life satisfaction. This study assessed the association between specific protective resources of students from a medical school in Visayas at all year levels with online-based education-related burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsA total of 234 medical students from a medical school in Visayas during the academic year 2020-2021 were sampled using stratified random sampling technique. Demographics were obtained. Specific protective resources of grit, religiosity, social support and tolerance for ambiguity, and burnout symptoms were measured using validated online questionnaires. Protective associations of specific resources on burnout levels were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Predictive capabilities of resources with statistically significant protective effects were summarized using Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. ResultsAll year levels experienced burnout based on Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS) subscales, with PBL 2 having the highest incidence comprising 33 respondents (49%). Majority of the students experienced moderate burnout on emotional exhaustion (44%) and low burnout on depersonalization (58%), while all of them had high burnout levels on the subscale of personal accomplishment (100%). Most students were moderately gritty (91%) and had high tolerance for ambiguity (98%), overall religiosity index (82%), and social support from significant others (68%); family (68%); and friends (76%). Grit, religiosity and social support had positive significant correlations and reductive effects to burnout. Tolerance for ambiguity did not show any significant relationship with burnout. Grit, religiosity and social support are good predictors of burnout. Grit had good diagnostic accuracy and discrimination. Religiosity and social support were moderately accurate predictors of burnout. ConclusionsGrit, religiosity and social support are significantly protective on burnout levels of medical students from online-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A cross-sectional survey of burnout in a sample of resident physicians in Sudan 96%
- Analysis of University Students’ Mental Health from the Perspective of Occupational Harmony 96%
- Prevalence and Severity of Anxiety, Depression, and Stress Among Optometry Students in Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acculturation stressors and academic adjustment among Nepalese students in South Korean higher education institutions 96%
- Conspiracy beliefs are associated with lower knowledge and higher anxiety levels regarding COVID-19 among students at the University of Jordan 96%
- The experience of distress during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-country examination on the fear of COVID-19 and the sense of loneliness 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anxiety, depression, and insomnia among nurses during the full liberalization of COVID-19: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis of the high-income region in China 93%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 93%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 97%
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 94%
- Psychiatric Manifestations and Associated Risk Factors among Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19 in Edo State, Nigeria 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Survey of Perceived Organizational Support 93%
- A cross-sectional study of socioeconomic status and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- A Cross-sectional Study on Perceived Workplace Health Support and Health-Related Quality of Life 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.