Back

Effects of Specific Protective Resources on the Burnout Levels of Selected Visayan Medical Students from Online-Based Education during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study

Arpilleda, J. J.; Bunal, J. P.; Montano, M. T.; Torrenueva, L. M.; Acebes, M. J.; Homecillo, M.; Salvador, J. P.; Tan, F. G.; Villanueva, Z.

2023-09-01 occupational and environmental health
10.1101/2023.08.28.23294675
Show abstract

BackgroundBurnout is a phenomenon characterized as a consistent state of being exhausted physically, mentally, and emotionally. Grit, tolerance for ambiguity, religiosity, and social support are protective factors that may mitigate burnout and improve life satisfaction. This study assessed the association between specific protective resources of students from a medical school in Visayas at all year levels with online-based education-related burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. MethodsA total of 234 medical students from a medical school in Visayas during the academic year 2020-2021 were sampled using stratified random sampling technique. Demographics were obtained. Specific protective resources of grit, religiosity, social support and tolerance for ambiguity, and burnout symptoms were measured using validated online questionnaires. Protective associations of specific resources on burnout levels were assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Predictive capabilities of resources with statistically significant protective effects were summarized using Receiving Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. ResultsAll year levels experienced burnout based on Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey (MBI-SS) subscales, with PBL 2 having the highest incidence comprising 33 respondents (49%). Majority of the students experienced moderate burnout on emotional exhaustion (44%) and low burnout on depersonalization (58%), while all of them had high burnout levels on the subscale of personal accomplishment (100%). Most students were moderately gritty (91%) and had high tolerance for ambiguity (98%), overall religiosity index (82%), and social support from significant others (68%); family (68%); and friends (76%). Grit, religiosity and social support had positive significant correlations and reductive effects to burnout. Tolerance for ambiguity did not show any significant relationship with burnout. Grit, religiosity and social support are good predictors of burnout. Grit had good diagnostic accuracy and discrimination. Religiosity and social support were moderately accurate predictors of burnout. ConclusionsGrit, religiosity and social support are significantly protective on burnout levels of medical students from online-based education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 15%
1.7× avg
2
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MDPI AG · based on 116 published papers
Top 0.3%
17× avg
3
Journal of Occupational Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 11 published papers
#1
335× avg
4
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 17 published papers
Top 0.2%
129× avg
5
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 3%
7.0× avg
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 35%
5.1%
7
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Frontiers Media SA · based on 56 published papers
Top 3%
9.3× avg
9
Psychiatry Research
Elsevier BV · based on 33 published papers
Top 3%
9.0× avg
10
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 11%
2.1× avg
11
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 10%
2.1× avg
12
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 42%
1.4%
13
JAMA Network Open
American Medical Association (AMA) · based on 125 published papers
Top 12%
2.0× avg
14
BMC Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 148 published papers
Top 18%
1.7× avg
15
Journal of Public Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 23 published papers
Top 3%
6.0× avg
16
Systematic Reviews
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
17
Archives of Public Health
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
18
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.9%
13× avg