Back

Convolutional neural network models of neuronal responses in macaque V1 reveal limited non-linear processing

Miao, H.-Y.; Tong, F.

2023-08-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.08.26.554952 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational models of the primary visual cortex (V1) have suggested that V1 neurons behave like Gabor filters followed by simple non-linearities. However, recent work employing convolutional neural network (CNN) models has suggested that V1 relies on far more non-linear computations than previously thought. Specifically, unit responses in an intermediate layer of VGG-19 were found to best predict macaque V1 responses to thousands of natural and synthetic images. Here, we evaluated the hypothesis that the poor performance of lower-layer units in VGG-19 might be attributable to their small receptive field size rather than to their lack of complexity per se. We compared VGG-19 with AlexNet, which has much larger receptive fields in its lower layers. Whereas the best-performing layer of VGG-19 occurred after seven non-linear steps, the first convolutional layer of AlexNet best predicted V1 responses. Although VGG-19s predictive accuracy was somewhat better than standard AlexNet, we found that a modified version of AlexNet could match VGG-19s performance after only a few non-linear computations. Control analyses revealed that decreasing the size of the input images caused the best-performing layer of VGG-19 to shift to a lower layer, consistent with the hypothesis that the relationship between image size and receptive field size can strongly affect model performance. We conducted additional analyses using a Gabor pyramid model to test for non-linear contributions of normalization and contrast saturation. Overall, our findings suggest that the feedforward responses of V1 neurons can be well explained by assuming only a few non-linear processing stages.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.