Back

Uncovering the Infection Strategy of Phyllachora maydis during Maize Colonization: A Comprehensive Analysis

Caldwell, D. L.; Da Silva, C. R.; McCoy, A. G.; Avila, H.; Bonkowski, J. C.; Chilvers, M.; Helm, M.; Telenko, D. E.; Iyer-Pascuzzi, A. S.

2023-08-27 plant biology
10.1101/2023.08.26.554799 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tar spot, a disease caused by the ascomycete fungal pathogen Phyllachora maydis, is considered one of the most significant yield-limiting diseases of maize (Zea mays L.) within the United States. P. maydis may also be found in association with other fungi, forming a disease complex with characteristic fish eye lesions. Understanding how P. maydis colonizes maize leaf cells is essential for developing effective disease control strategies. Here, we used histological approaches to elucidate how P. maydis infects and multiplies within susceptible maize leaves. We collected tar spot-infected maize leaf samples from four different fields in northern Indiana at three different time points during the growing season. Samples were chemically fixed and paraffin-embedded for high-resolution light and scanning electron microscopy. We observed a consistent pattern of disease progression in independent leaf samples collected across different geographical regions. Each stromata contained a central pycnidium that produced asexual spores. Perithecia with sexual spores developed in the stomatal chambers adjacent to the pycnidia, and a cap of spores formed over the stromata. P. maydis reproductive structures formed around but not within the vasculature. In our samples containing fish eye lesions, P. maydis is associated with two additional fungi, one of which is likely a member of the Paraphaeospheria genus; the other is an unknown fungi. Our data provide fundamental insights into how this pathogen colonizes and spreads within maize leaves. This knowledge can inform new approaches to managing tar spot, which could help mitigate the significant economic losses caused by this disease.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.0%
2
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
5
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.9%
9
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
11
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Fungal Genetics and Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
21
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
26
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%