Real-World Experience Of Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery In A Developing Southeast Asian Country
Dy Closas, A. M. F.; Tan, A. H.; Tay, Y. W.; Hor, J. W.; Toh, T. S.; Lim, J. L.; Lew, C. Y.; Cham, C. Y.; Yim, C. C. W.; Chee, K. Y.; Ng, C. G.; Lit, L. C.; Khairul Anuar, A. N.; Lange, L. M.; Fang, Z.-H.; Bandres Ciga, S.; Lohmann, K.; Klein, C.; Ahmad-Annuar, A.; Muthusamy, K. A.; Lim, S.-Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe availability of deep brain stimulation (DBS), a highly efficacious treatment for several movement disorders, remains low in developing countries, with scarce data available on utilization and outcomes. ObjectivesWe characterized the DBS cohort and outcomes at a Malaysian quaternary medical centre. MethodsA retrospective chart review was done on DBS-related surgery at the University of Malaya, including clinico-demographic, genetics, and outcomes data focusing on post-operative medication reduction and complications. Results149 Parkinsons disease (PD) patients underwent DBS targeting the subthalamic nucleus. Six had globus pallidus internus DBS (primarily for dystonia). Only 16.1% of cases were government-funded. Of the 133 PD patients operated in the past decade (2013-2022), 25 (18.8%) had disease duration <5 years. At 6-12 months post-DBS, median levodopa-equivalent daily dosage (LEDD) reduction was 440.5 [418.9] mg/day, corresponding to a reduction of [≥]50% and [≥]30% in 42.2% and 69.8% of patients, respectively. LEDD reductions were larger in the early-onset and short-duration subgroups. Three patients (1.9% of 155) had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, resulting in stroke in two. Pathogenic monogenic or GBA1 variants were detected in 12/61 (19.7%) of patients tested, mostly comprising the "severe" GBA1 variant p.L483P (14.8%). ConclusionThis is the largest report on DBS from Southeast Asia. The procedures were effective, and complication rates on par with international norms. Our study found a high frequency of GBA1-PD; and included a substantial number of patients with short-duration PD, who had good outcomes. It also highlights the inequity of access to device-aided therapy.