Back

Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients without Revascularization: Results from a China Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAMI) registry study

Huang, C.; CAMI (China Acute Myocardial Infarction) Registry Study Group, ; Yang, J.; Li, L.; He, S.; Zhang, X.; Xu, H.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, S.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, W.; Jin, C.; Gao, X.; Yang, Y.

2023-08-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.08.22.23294450 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAt least 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is one of the standards of care following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, study on prolonged DAPT for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients without revascularization is limited. MethodsWe studied 1744 AMI patients without revascularization from the China Acute Myocardial Infarction registry between January 2013 and September 2014. These patients were on DAPT and did not experience AMI, stroke, or bleeding events at 12-month follow-up. We divided them into two groups: 12-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 12 months but less than 18 months) and 18-month DAPT group (DAPT for at least 18 months). The primary outcome is 24-month all-cause death. ResultsOverall, 1221 (70.0%) patients took DAPT for [&ge;]12 months but <18 months, while 523 (30.0%) patients took DAPT for [&ge;]18 months. The two groups had comparable proportions with high ischemic risk (27.0% vs. 25.6%, P = 0.5418), as well as high bleeding risk (29.0% vs. 28.5%, P = 0.8316). At 24 months, the all-cause mortality rate of 18-month DAPT group was significantly lower than that for 12-month DAPT group (3.7% vs 5.9%, P = 0.0471). Adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause death also showed statistical significance (0.59, 95% CI: 0.35-0.99, P = 0.0444). ConclusionsDAPT for at least 18 months was associated with lower 24-month mortality for non-revascularization AMI patients without events within 12 months after onset.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
5
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.9%
7
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
12
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
14
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
17
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
26
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%