Back

First-Time Prescribing of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists from 2018-2023: A Descriptive Analysis

Rodriguez, P. J.; Gratzl, S.; Goodwin Cartwright, B. M.; Brar, R.; Gluckman, T. J.; Stucky, N.

2023-08-25 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.08.22.23294277 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimsLimited recent data exist on prescribing patterns and patient characteristics for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), an important drug class for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and/or overweight or obesity. We describe trends in first-time prescribing of GLP-1 RAs. Materials and MethodsUsing aggregated US electronic health record data, we identified first-time prescriptions of GLP-1 RAs between January 2018 and June 2023 for adults receiving regular care. We describe prescribing volumes stratified by patient characteristics, specific drug, and FDA-labelled indication. The 5.5-year analysis period was divided into six-month periods. ResultsIn total, 274,562 patients were newly prescribed a GLP-1 RA, with a significant increase over time (January to June, 2018: 9,642 versus 2023: 66,569; p < 0.001). Overall, 181,860 (66.2%) patients had T2D and 229,715 (83.7%) had obesity or overweight. The proportion with T2D decreased over time (January through June, 2018: 84.1% versus 2023: 49%; p < 0.001), while the proportion with overweight or obesity increased (January through June, 2018: 75.9% versus 2023: 90.7%; p <.001). Of prescriptions with a known FDA-labelled indication (74.2%), 87% were labelled for T2D and 13% were labelled for overweight or obesity. Patients first prescribed a GLP-1 RA labelled for T2D were 59.1% female with a mean (SD) age of 58.6 (13) years, while those prescribed a GLP-1 RA labelled for overweight or obesity were 82.9% female, with a mean (SD) age of 48.2 (12.2) years. ConclusionsWe observed an increase in first-time prescribing of GLP-1 RAs overall, and a shift away from a predominately T2D population.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.