Back

`Mind in Vitro' platforms: Versatile, scalable, robust and open solutions to interfacing with living neurons

Zhang, X.; Dou, Z.; Kim, S.-H.; Upadhyay, G.; Havert, D.; Kang, S.; Kazemi, K.; Huang, K.-Y.; Aydin, O.; Huang, R.; Rahman, S.; Ellis-Mohr, A.; Noblet, H. A.; Lim, K. H.; Chung, H. J.; Gritton, H. J.; Saif, M. T. A.; Kong, H. J.; Beggs, J. M.; Gazzola, M.

2023-08-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.08.21.554033 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motivated by the unexplored potential of in vitro neural systems for computing, and by the corresponding need of versatile, scalable interfaces for multimodal interaction, we present an accurate, modular, fully customizable and portable recording/stimulation solution that can be easily fabricated, robustly operated, and broadly disseminated. A reconfigurable platform that works across multiple industry standards enables a complete signal chain, from neural substrates sampled through high-density Micro-Electrode Arrays (MEAs) to data acquisition, downstream analysis and cloud storage. Built-in modularity supports the seamless integration of electrical/optical stimulation and fluidic interfaces. Custom MEA fabrication leverages maskless photolithography, favoring the rapid prototyping of a variety of configurations and spatial topologies. Through a native analysis and management software suite, the utility and robustness of our system is demonstrated across neural cultures and applications, including embryonic stem cell-derived and primary neurons, organotypic brain slices, 3D engineered tissue mimics, concurrent calcium imaging and long-term recording. Overall, our technology, termed Mind in Vitro to underscore the computing inspiration, provides an end-to-end solution that can be widely deployed due to its affordable (>10X cost-reduction) and open-source nature, catering to the expanding needs of both conventional and unconventional electrophysiology.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.