Assessing The Value Of Deep Neural Networks For Postoperartive Complication Prediction In Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients
Bonde, M.; Bonde, A.; Kaafarani, H.; Sillesen, M.; Millarch, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications (PoCs) and risk prediction of these is therefore critical for optimal treatment planning. We hypothesize that novel deep learning network approaches through transfer learning may be superior to legacy approaches for PoC risk prediction in the PDAC surgical setting. MethodsData from the US National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2002-2018 was used, with a total of 5,881,881 million patients, including 31,728 PD patients. Modelling approaches comprised of a model trained on a general surgery patient cohort and then tested on a PD specific cohort (general model), a transfer learning model trained on the general surgery patients with subsequent transfer and retraining on a PD-specific patient cohort (transfer learning model), a model trained and tested exclusively on the PD-specific patient cohort (direct model), and a benchmark random forest model trained on the PD patient cohort (RF model). The models were subsequently compared against the American College of Surgeons (ACS) surgical risk calculator (SRC) in terms of predicting mortality and morbidity risk. ResultsBoth the general model and transfer learning model outperformed the RF model in 14 and 16 out of 19 prediction tasks, respectively. Additionally, both models outperformed the direct model on 17 out of the 19 tasks. The transfer learning model also outperformed the general model on 11 out of the 19 prediction tasks. The transfer learning model outperformed the ACS-SRC regarding mortality and all the models outperformed the ACS-SRC regarding the morbidity prediction with the general model achieving the highest Receiver Operator Area Under the Curve (ROC AUC) of 0.668 compared to the 0.524 of the ACS SRC. ConclusionDNNs deployed using a transfer learning approach may be of value for PoC risk prediction in the PD setting.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 97%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 96%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 91%
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 91%
- Linking Patient Records at Scale with a Hybrid Approach Combining Contrastive Learning and Deterministic Rules 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Expert Surgeons and Deep Learning Models Can Predict the Outcome of Surgical Hemorrhage from One Minute of Video 94%
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 93%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 94%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 93%
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Scene Understanding: A Systematic Review and Reporting Quality Meta-Analysis 93%
- Quantifying Device Type and Handedness Biases in a Remote Parkinson’s Disease AI-Powered Assessment 92%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.