Back

Assessing The Value Of Deep Neural Networks For Postoperartive Complication Prediction In Pancreaticoduodenectomy Patients

Bonde, M.; Bonde, A.; Kaafarani, H.; Sillesen, M.; Millarch, A.

2023-08-22 surgery
10.1101/2023.08.21.23294364 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionPancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with a high risk of postoperative complications (PoCs) and risk prediction of these is therefore critical for optimal treatment planning. We hypothesize that novel deep learning network approaches through transfer learning may be superior to legacy approaches for PoC risk prediction in the PDAC surgical setting. MethodsData from the US National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) 2002-2018 was used, with a total of 5,881,881 million patients, including 31,728 PD patients. Modelling approaches comprised of a model trained on a general surgery patient cohort and then tested on a PD specific cohort (general model), a transfer learning model trained on the general surgery patients with subsequent transfer and retraining on a PD-specific patient cohort (transfer learning model), a model trained and tested exclusively on the PD-specific patient cohort (direct model), and a benchmark random forest model trained on the PD patient cohort (RF model). The models were subsequently compared against the American College of Surgeons (ACS) surgical risk calculator (SRC) in terms of predicting mortality and morbidity risk. ResultsBoth the general model and transfer learning model outperformed the RF model in 14 and 16 out of 19 prediction tasks, respectively. Additionally, both models outperformed the direct model on 17 out of the 19 tasks. The transfer learning model also outperformed the general model on 11 out of the 19 prediction tasks. The transfer learning model outperformed the ACS-SRC regarding mortality and all the models outperformed the ACS-SRC regarding the morbidity prediction with the general model achieving the highest Receiver Operator Area Under the Curve (ROC AUC) of 0.668 compared to the 0.524 of the ACS SRC. ConclusionDNNs deployed using a transfer learning approach may be of value for PoC risk prediction in the PD setting.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.1%
8
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
9
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
12
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
18
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
23
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%