Findings from a Pilot of a Near Real Time Disease Surveillance Tool on the NATO Mission in Kosovo
Lindfield, R.; Biendl, C.; Toth, M.; Ruhl, S.
Show abstract
NATO has a requirement for a near real time surveillance (NRTS) tool to rapidly identify disease outbreaks but no deployable tool is available. The NATO Centre of Excellence for Military Medicine (MILMED COE) developed a NRTS tool and piloted it on the NATO Mission in Kosovo (KFOR). Ten medical treatment facilities (MTFs) in KFOR piloted the tool which is an app on a smart device. All first presentations were eligible for inclusion into the app. Primary presenting symptoms were mapped to one or more of 40 symptoms. No patient identifiable information was collected. Analysis was available to each MTF and the Medical HQ staff (JMED) which provided a summary of the data collected. Combinations of symptoms resulted in an alert email to the JMED and MTF. An evaluation was conducted at two time points consisting of data analysis and semi-structured interviews with key informants from each participating MTF and JMED team. 1351 patients were entered during the pilot. 851 reports had symptoms recorded. The leading symptoms were pain-in-throat, cough and temperature. Two investigations were launched based on reporting in the app; a cluster of skin lesions and two cases of diarrhoea. No significant outbreaks were reported during the pilot or detected by the app. Interviews revealed that the app was easy to use and the symptom list was comprehensive. The analysis tool was not regularly viewed by MTFs however the JMED team used it frequently. Alerts were considered extremely valuable by both the MTFs and JMED team. The KFOR pilot provided an excellent opportunity to pilot the tool in a NATO Mission and established that the way it collected data and alerted issues worked well. Further validation and analysis of the tool is required before it can be rolled out further.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying clinical skill gaps of healthcare workers using a digital clinical decision support algorithm during outpatient pediatric consultations in primary health centers in Rwanda 94%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 94%
- A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 94%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: A qualitative study of university students and staff 93%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 93%
- Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning for Paediatric Related Decision Support in Emergency Care - A UK and Ireland Network Survey Study 93%
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 93%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 93%
- Snotwatch COVID-Toes: An ecological study of chilblains and COVID-19 diagnoses in Victoria, Australia 92%
- International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.