Response diversity is key to buffer ecosystem productivity against multiple environmental change drivers
Tatsumi, S.; Punwasi, N.; Roberto, A.; Cadotte, M. W.
Show abstract
Evidence shows that biodiversity promotes primary productivity. However, it is unclear whether such biodiversity-productivity relationships persist under increasing numbers of environmental changes in the current Anthropocene. Here, we use theoretical and experimental approaches to demonstrate that variation in species responses to changing environments determines the ability of ecological communities to maintain productivity under multiple types of environmental change. Our theory shows that this response diversity determines whether biodiversity-productivity relationships are enhanced or impaired by environmental changes. Communities with high response diversity are expected not only to be productive in a particular environment but to maintain that productivity under multiple conditions. Nevertheless, our theory also predicts that such buffering effects fade with increasing negative environmental impacts on communities. Consistent with this prediction, our biodiversity experiment reveals impaired biodiversity-productivity relationships under multiple environmental change drivers with a negative mean impact. Our results suggest that, in the face of growing multiplicity of environmental changes, policies should encourage conservation of local biota, enabling communities to respond to unprecedented environments that may arise.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Co-occurrence history increases ecosystem temporal stability and recovery from a flood in experimental plant communities 92%
- Top predators govern multitrophic diversity effects in tritrophic food webs 91%
- Inferring ecological selection from multidimensional community trait distributions along environmental gradients 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.