Back

Single-dose epidural bupivacaine vs placebo after lumbar decompression surgery: A Randomized controlled trial

Hermans, S.; Lantinga-Zee, A.; Droeghaag, R.; van Santbrink, H.; van Hemert, W.; Reinders, M.; Hoofwijk, D.; van Kuijk, S.; Rijkers, K.; Curfs, I.

2023-08-21 pain medicine
10.1101/2023.08.20.23294347
Show abstract

IntroductionAdequate postoperative pain management following lumbar spinal decompression surgery is important as it will lead to early mobilization, less complications and shorter hospital stay. Opioid consumption should be limited due to their frequently accompanied side effects and their addictive nature. During the final phase of lumbar decompression surgery, the epidural space becomes easily accessible. This might be an ideal moment for surgeons to administer an epidural bolus of analgesia, as a safe and effective method for post-operative pain relief. MethodsThis is a double blind randomized controlled trial comparing a single intraoperative bolus of epidural analgesia using bupivacaine 0.25% to placebo (NaCl 0,9%) and its effect on postoperative pain following lumbar spinal decompression surgery. The primary outcome was the difference in NRS pain between the intervention and placebo groups during the first 48h after surgery. It was hypothesized that the intervention group will have lower postoperative NRS pain scores. ResultsBoth the intervention group and the placebo group consisted of 20 randomized patients (N=40). We observed statistically significant lower NRS pain scores in the intervention group in comparison with the control group, with a difference of -1.9 ({+/-}1.1). The average pain score was lower in the intervention group at all postoperative time-points. Opioid consumption, quality of life and satisfaction were similar between study groups. No study related complications occurred, and complications rate did not differ between study groups. ConclusionThis randomized controlled trial shows that administrating a bolus of intraoperative epidural bupivacaine is a safe and effective method in reducing early postoperative pain following lumbar decompression surgery.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 4%
3.3× avg
2
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 20%
1.6× avg
3
BMC Neurology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
#1
98× avg
4
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 19%
5.7%
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
45× avg
6
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
7
Pain
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.6%
25× avg
8
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.9%
24× avg
9
Cureus
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 64 published papers
Top 7%
3.6× avg
10
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 7%
3.5× avg
11
The Journal of Pain
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
25× avg
12
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 1%
10× avg
13
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Elsevier BV · based on 19 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
14
Brain Sciences
MDPI AG · based on 19 published papers
Top 0.8%
18× avg
15
Clinical and Translational Science
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Wiley · based on 19 published papers
Top 1%
7.1× avg
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 17%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 140 published papers
Top 8%
2.2× avg
19
Social Science & Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
8.1× avg