Back

Identifying selective predictors of ADHD, Oppositional Defiant and Conduct Disorder onset in early adolescence with optimized deep learning

de Lacy, N.; Ramshaw, M.

2023-08-22 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.08.19.23294322 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe externalizing disorders of ADHD, Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder (CD) exhibit a strong uptick in incidence in late childhood to become some of the most common mental health conditions in adolescence and strong predictors of adult psychopathology. While treatable, substantial diagnostic overlap exists among the externalizing disorders, complicating intervention planning. Thus, early adolescence is a period of considerable interest in understanding which factors predict the onset of externalizing disorders and disambiguating those that may differentially predict the development of ADD versus (vs) ODD and CD. Materials and MethodsHere, we analyzed 5,777 multimodal candidate predictors collected from children age 9-10 yrs and their parents in the ABCD cohort spanning demographics; developmental and medical history; physiologic function; academic performance; social, physical and cultural environment; activities of everyday life, substance use and cortical and subcortical brain structure, volumetrics, connectivity and function to predict the future onset of ADHD, ODD and CD at 2-year follow-up. We used deep learning optimized with an innovative AI algorithm that jointly optimizes model training and performs automated feature selection to construct prospective, individual-level predictions of illness onset in this high-dimension data. Additional experiments furnished predictive models of all prevailing cases at 11-12 yrs and examined relative predictive performance when candidate predictors were restricted to only neural metrics derived from MRI. ResultsMultimodal models achieved strong, consistent performance with [~]86-97% accuracy, 0.919-0.996 AUROC and [~]82-97% precision and recall in testing in held-out, unseen data. In neural-only models, predictive performance dropped substantially but nonetheless accuracy and AUROC of [~]80% were achieved. Parent aggressive and externalizing traits uniquely differentiated the onset of ODD while structural MRI metrics in the limbic system specifically predicted the onset of CD. Psychosocial measures of sleep disorders, parent mental health and behavioral traits and school performance proved valuable across all disorders but cognitive and non-neural physiologic metrics were never selected. In neural-only models, structural and functional MRI metrics in subcortical regions and cortical-subcortical connectivity were emphasized over task fMRI or diffusion measures. Overall, we identified a strong correlation between accuracy and final predictor importance. ConclusionsDeep learning optimized with AI can generate highly accurate individual-level predictions of the onset of early adolescent externalizing disorders using multimodal features. Analysis of 5,777 multimodal candidate predictors highlighted psychosocial predictors related to sleep disorders, school performance and parent mental health and behavioral traits over other feature types. While externalizing disorders are frequently co-morbid in adolescents, certain predictors appeared specific to the onset of ODD or CD vs ADHD with structural MRI metrics in the limbic system offering particular promise in identifying children at risk for the onset of CD, a highly disabling disorder. The strong observed correlation between predictive accuracy and final predictor importance suggests that principled, data-driven searches for impactful predictors may facilitate the construction of robust, individual-level models in high-dimension data. To our knowledge, this is the first machine learning study to predict the onset of all three major adolescent externalizing disorders with the same design and participant cohort to enable direct comparisons, analyze >200 multimodal features and include as many types of neuroimaging metrics. Future work to test our observations in external validation data will help further test the generalizability of these findings.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.1%
3
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
6
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
9
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
21
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
23
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
27
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
30
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%