Back

CYP2C19 and effect of clopidogrel for secondary prevention of major ischemic events: systematic review and meta-analysis

Kremers, F. C. C.; van den Biggelaar, J.; Lingsma, H. F.; van Schaik, R. H. N.; Roozenbeek, B.; Dippel, D. W.

2023-08-20 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.08.17.23292850 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCarriers of the CYP2C19 Loss of Function (LoF) allele may experience decreased efficacy of clopidogrel in secondary prevention after cardiovascular events. Randomized clinical trials of clopidogrel in patients with known CYP2C19 carrier status provided inconsistent results. Our aim was to pool the evidence on the effect of clopidogrel on outcome, according to CYP2C19 LoF status, in a meta-analysis. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effect of clopidogrel according to CYP2C19 LoF status in patients with cardiovascular disease and recent TIA or stroke was performed. The primary outcomes were 1) ischemic stroke and 2) major adverse cardiac events (MACE). We used random effects analysis to estimate the effect of clopidogrel as a pooled odds ratio (OR) in carriers and non-carriers of the LoF variant and tested for interaction between clopidogrel and CYP2C19. ResultsWe included six RCTs with a total of 15,141 participants comparing combined clopidogrel and aspirin therapy to aspirin monotherapy. The effect of clopidogrel on MACE was OR=0.70 in CYP2C19 non-variant carriers compared to OR=0.84 in CYP2C19 variant carriers (pinteraction=0.13). In patients with a recent TIA or minor ischemic stroke, the OR for the effect of clopidogrel on MACE was OR=0.52 in CYP2C19 non-variant carriers compared to OR=0.84 in CYP2C19 variant carriers (pinteraction=0.02) while in patients with cardiovascular disease the difference in effect was not evident (non-variant carriers OR=0.76, variant carriers OR= 0.84, pinteraction=0.50). ConclusionOur meta-analysis could not establish that overall, clopidogrel is less effective in patients with a recent MI, minor stroke or TIA and a CYP2C19 LoF genotype. However, the size and direction of the difference in effect warrants further research. Registration - URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021242993.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
3
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.9%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.9%
6
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
10
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
22
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
23
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
25
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
28
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
29
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
30
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%