Back

Distinct Microstructural Heterogeneities Underpin Specific Micromechanical Properties in Human ACL Femoral and Tibial Entheses

Fang, J.; Wang, X.; Lai, H.; Li, W.; pan, z.; Mao, R.; Yan, Y.; Xie, C.; Lin, J.; Sun, W.; Li, R.; Wang, J.; Dai, J.; Xu, K.; Yu, X.; Xu, T.; Duan, W.; Qian, J.; Hongwei, O.; Dai, X.

2023-08-18 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.08.16.553628 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is anchored to the femur and tibia by a specialized interface tissue called the enthesis, which transfers forces in multiple directions and magnitudes without accruing fatigue damage during loading cycles over a lifetime. However, the precise structural and mechanical characteristics of the ACL femoral enthesis (FE) and tibial enthesis (TE) and their intricate interplay are unknown. In this study, we identified two ultrathin-graded mineralization regions in the FE ([~]21 m) and TE ([~]14 m), both of which exhibited distinct biomolecular compositions and mineral assembly patterns. FE interface exhibited progressively maturing hydroxyapatites (HAps), whereas minerals at the TE interface region changed from an amorphous phase (ACP) to HAps with increasing crystallinity. The LC-MS/MS results revealed that MGP protein uniquely enriched at the TE interface may be favorable for stabilizing ACP, while CLEC11A enriched at the FE interface could facilitate osteogenesis of the interface. The finite element analysis results indicated that the FE model was more resistant to shearing, while the TE model facilitated tensile resistance. It suggested that the great discrepancy in biomolecular expression and the corresponding mineral assembling heterogeneities together contributed to the superior mechanical properties of both the FE and TE models. These findings provide new perspectives regarding the management of ACL injury and the development of high-performance interface materials.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.4%
3
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
6
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
8
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.2%
11
Nano Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 16%
2.2%
13
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
14
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
20
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.0%
24
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
25
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
27
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.6%
30
npj Regenerative Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%