Back

Comparison of transthoracic ultrasonography, computer-assisted lung auscultation, and transtracheal wash cytology in stocker cattle with bovine respiratory disease

Scott, M. A.; Woolums, A. R.; Carter, H. F.; Wills, R. W.; Bulla, C.; Karisch, B. B.

2023-08-18 immunology
10.1101/2023.08.16.553541 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Field methods to diagnose bovine respiratory disease (BRD) do not accurately identify airway inflammation and lack clinical sensitivity. New diagnostic modalities, such as thoracic ultrasound (TU), computer-assisted lung auscultation (CALA), and transtracheal wash (TTW), have recently emerged which may deliver accurate diagnosis and prediction of BRD in clinical settings. Therefore, we sought to compare TU, CALA, and TTW fluid cytologic assessment in stocker cattle at risk for BRD in a pilot study. We enrolled 17 high-risk mixed-breed beef steers, sampled 10 and 21 days after arrival and conventional management, in a pilot cross-sectional observational study. Cattle were examined daily for 82 days for clinical BRD. On day 10, 16 cattle received CALA, and 10 and 8 of these received TU and TTW, respectively. On day 21, 12 cattle received CALA and TTW, and 10 received TU. CALA was scored as 1-5. Lung consolidation and/or comet tails were evaluated by TU. TTW was evaluated by 200-cell differential count, with inflammation defined as >20% neutrophils. Relationships between each diagnostic test, and between diagnostic tests and clinical BRD, were evaluated by logistic regression (P<0.10). Fourteen cattle were treated for BRD. CALA scores ranged 1-3; three cattle had lung consolidation. On day 10, 5 of 6 cattle previously treated for BRD and 0 of 3 not treated had >20% TTW neutrophils. On day 21, 5 of 9 treated cattle and 1 of 3 not treated had >20% TTW neutrophils. No significant relationship between CALA, TU, and TTW inflammation existed. TTW inflammation was associated with BRD diagnosis (P=0.0586). CALA and TU results were unrelated to TTW inflammation. Cytologic assessment of TTW may improve antemortem diagnosis of BRD.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Dairy Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.7%
4
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
8
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Infection and Immunity
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Developmental & Comparative Immunology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
21
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
29
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
30
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%