Coronary Artery anomalies in PatienTs Undergoing transcatheter aortic valve REplacement. The CAPTURE registry
Oliva, O. A.; Scalia, L.; Sisinni, A.; Poletti, E.; Zannoni, J.; Mazzucca, M.; Criscione, E.; Popolo Rubbio, A.; Gorla, R.; Agnifili, M. l.; Bedogni, F.; Testa, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe incidence and possible implications of coronary artery anomalies (CAA) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are uncertain. AimsTo evaluate the impact of CAA on TAVR outcomes, and to suggest possible strategies to prevent CAA related complications. MethodsAmong 2,164 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR in our center, 15 (0.69%) were identified to have a CAA, based on pre-operative Computed Tomography (CT) scans. ResultsCT-angiography revealed the following features of CAA: the majority of anomalous CAA concerned the right coronary artery (80%), followed by the left main (13.3%) and the left circumflex (6.7%). An intramural course was observed only in 26.7% patients, whereas an acute take-off was detected in more than half of the study cohort (53.3%). High-risk sudden cardiac death features were observed in 6 (40%) patients. Technical success was 86.7%, device success was 80%. One patient experienced a cardiac arrest 15 minutes after procedure, resulting from occlusion of the anomalous right coronary artery with the ostium located at the right-to-non coronary commissure. There were no cases of [≥] moderate paravalvular leak or stroke. One non-cardiac related death was recorded 4 months after the procedure. ConclusionsThe interaction between transcatheter bioprosthesis and different CAA types could lead to ominous sequelae, if not promptly recognized and treated accordingly.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 96%
- Patient Screening for Self-Expanding Percutaneous Pulmonary Valves using Virtual Reality 96%
- Treatment of Slow-flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-mediated Hyperemia. The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex-Related Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Valves: Insights from the OPERA-TAVI Registry 96%
- Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel: the Impact of Platelet Inhibition on Cerebrovascular Microembolic Events during TAVR 96%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk and severity of COVID-19 and ABO blood group in transcatheter aortic valve patients 96%
- Risk Prediction of Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients Without Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Using a Comprehensive Clinical, Laboratory and Echocardiographic Diagnostic Score 94%
- Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation among Cancer Patients: Utilization Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Two-Year Real World Clinical Outcomes after Intravascular Imaging Device Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Ultrathin-Strut Biodegradable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent 95%
- Inpatient Outcomes Of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices and Bridging to Transplantation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 94%
- Utility of the CHADS-P 2 A 2 RC score for estimating net adverse clinical events in chronic coronary syndrome patients without atrial fibrillation: insights from the CLIDAS-PCI 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved Hemodynamic Performance and Reduced Paravalvular Regurgitation with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA Valve: A Propensity-Matched Single-Center TAVR Study 95%
- Autologous cardiac micrografts as support therapy to coronary artery bypass surgery 95%
- Results of the inoperable and operable with aortic valve endocarditis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.