Back

Synergistic activity of rhamnolipid combined with linezolid against linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium

Chang, Q.; Chen, H.; Li, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, P.; Gao, M.; Ge, J.

2023-08-14 microbiology
10.1101/2023.08.14.553254 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Enterococci resistance is increasing sharply, which poses a serious threat to public health. Rhamnolipids are a kind of amphiphilic compound used for its bioactivities, while the combination of nontraditional drugs to restore linezolid activity is an attractive strategy to treat infections caused by these pathogens. This study aimed to investigate the activity of linezolid in combination with the rhamnolipids against Enterococcus faecium. Here, we determined that the rhamnolipids could enhance the efficacy of linezolid against enterococci infections by a checkerboard MIC assay, a time-kill assay, a combined disk test, anti-biofilm assay, molecular simulation dynamics, and mouse infection models. We identified that the combination of rhamnolipids and linezolid restored the linezolid sensitivity. Anti-biofilm experiments show that our new scheme can effectively inhibit biofilm generation. The mouse infection model demonstrated that the combination therapy significantly reduced the bacterial load in the feces, colons and kidneys following subcutaneous administration. This study showed that rhamnolipids could play a synergistic role with linezolid against Enterococcus. Our combined agents could be appealing candidates for developing new combinatorial agents to restore antibiotic efficacy in the treatment of linezolid-resistant Enterococcus infections. HighlightThe identification of a potential inhibitor of LRE, RLS could restore the antibacterial activity of LNZ. A rational mechanism of synergism between LNZ and RLS. ;;L;;RLS in combination with LNZ promote the egress of pathogenic E. faecium from the intestinal tract of mice to reduce its colonization, which has obvious synergistic effects.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antibiotics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.2%
2
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
13.2%
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
187 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
6
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.2%
8
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
10
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
11
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
13
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
17
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Microbial Pathogenesis
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
21
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
23
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%