Back

GalNAc-siRNA Mediated Knockdown of Ketohexokinase Versus Systemic, Small Molecule Inhibition of its Kinase Activity Exert Divergent Effects on Hepatic Metabolism in Mice on a HFD

Softic, S.; Park, S.-H.; Fadhul, T.; Conroy, L. R.; Clarke, H.; Sun, R. C.; Wallenius, K.; Boucher, J.; O'Mahony, G.; Boianelli, A.; Persson, M.; Martinez, G. J.; Hinds, T. D.; Divanovic, S.

2023-08-14 molecular biology
10.1101/2023.08.14.553218 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Consumption of diets high in sugar and fat are well-established risk factors for the development of obesity and its metabolic complications, including non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Metabolic dysfunction associated with sugar intake is dependent on fructose metabolism via ketohexokinase (KHK). Here, we compared the effects of systemic, small molecule inhibition of KHK enzymatic activity to hepatocyte-specific, GalNAc-siRNA mediated knockdown of KHK in mice on a HFD. Both modalities led to an improvement in liver steatosis, however, via substantially different mechanisms. KHK knockdown profoundly decreased lipogenesis, while the inhibitor increased the fatty acid oxidation pathway. Moreover, hepatocyte-specific KHK knockdown completely prevented hepatic fructose metabolism and improved glucose tolerance. Conversely, KHK inhibitor only partially reduced fructose metabolism, but it also decreased downstream triokinase. This led to the accumulation of fructose-1 phosphate, resulting in glycogen accumulation, hepatomegaly, and impaired glucose tolerance. In summary, KHK profoundly impacts hepatic metabolism, likely via both kinase-dependent and independent mechanisms. HIGHLIGHTSO_LIKHK knockdown or inhibition of its kinase activity differently target hepatic metabolism. C_LIO_LIKHK inhibitor increases F1P and glycogen accumulation as it also lowers triokinase. C_LIO_LIKHK knockdown completely prevents hepatic fructose metabolism and lipogenesis. C_LIO_LIE of wild type, but not mutant, kinase dead KHK-C increases glycogen accumulation. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.0%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.1%
50% of probability mass above
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 19%
4.7%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
5
Cell Metabolism
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
6
Nature Metabolism
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
7
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
8
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
9
Journal of Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
10
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
11
Hepatology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
13
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
16
Hepatology Communications
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
18
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
23
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.5%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
25
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
27
Acta Physiologica
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%