Back

Foot position during plantarflexion changes gastrocnemii motor unit discharge rate in runners with Achilles tendinopathy but not in the way you might think

Fernandes, G. L.; Orssatto, L. B.; Shield, A. J.; Trajano, G. S.

2023-08-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.08.14.553177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Runners with Achilles tendinopathy (AT) have reduced neural drive to the gastrocnemius lateralis (GL). This study investigated if the strategy of pointing feet-inward (feet-in) during isometric plantarflexion would increase gastrocnemius lateralis electromyography root mean square amplitude (RMS) and motor unit discharge rates, compared to feet-in neutral position (feet-neutral), in runners with Achilles Tendinopathy (AT). High-density electromyograms were recorded from gastrocnemius lateralis and medialis, during 20-s feet-in and feet-neutral isometric heel raise, in runners with (n=18) and without (n=19) AT. During feet-in, GL RMS was higher during feet-in in both groups and GM RMS was lower only during feet-in in the AT. Conversely, motor unit discharge rates were lower during feet-in in GL (p<0.001) and in GM in the AT group. The AT group had lower triceps surae endurance during single leg heel raise. In summary, feet-in increases GL RMS in both groups, conversely reducing motor unit discharge rates in the AT group, compared to feet-neutral. Additionally, feet-in reduces GM RMS and motor unit discharge rates only in the AT group, compared to feet-neutral. This would shift the gastrocnemius lateralis/medialis ratio excitation, favouring gastrocnemius lateralis. Nonetheless, while this strategy holds promise, it remains uncertain whether performing plantarflexion exercise with feet pointed inwards would provide additional benefits for the treatment of runners with Achilles tendinopathy. Our findings suggest that the increased GL RMS during feet-in is effective in increasing GL excitation but not as consequence of increased MUDR and, but it might be a result of recruitment of more motor units.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.9%
2
Experimental Physiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
4
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.5%
5
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
8
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
11
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
14
Journal of Anatomy
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
20
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
25
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
26
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
27
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
30
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%