Does urbanization lead to parallel demographic shifts across the world in a cosmopolitan plant?
Caizergues, A. E.; Santangelo, J. S.; Ness, R. W.; Angeoletto, F.; Anstett, D. N.; Anstett, J.; Baena-Diaz, F.; Carlen, E. J.; Chaves, J. A.; Comerford, M. S.; Dyson, K.; Falahati-Anbaran, M.; Fellowes, M. D. E.; Hodgins, K. A.; Hood, G. R.; Iniguez-Armijos, C.; Kooyers, N. J.; Lazaro-Lobo, A.; Moles, A. T.; Munshi-South, J.; Paule, J.; Porth, I. M.; Santiago-Rosario, L. Y.; Stack Whitney, K.; Tack, A. J. M.; Johnson, M. T. J.
Show abstract
Urbanization is occurring globally, leading to dramatic environmental changes that are altering the ecology and evolution of species. In particular, the expansion of human infrastructure and the loss and fragmentation of natural habitats in cities is predicted to increase genetic drift and reduce gene flow by reducing the size and connectivity of populations. Alternatively, the "urban facilitation model" suggests that some species will have greater gene flow into and within cities leading to higher diversity and lower differentiation in urban populations. These alternative hypotheses have not been contrasted across multiple cities. Here, we used the genomic data from the Global Urban Evolution project (GLUE), to study the effects of urbanization on non-adaptive evolutionary processes of white clover (Trifolium repens) at a global scale. We found that white clover populations presented high genetic diversity and no evidence of a reduction in Ne linked to urbanization. On the contrary, we found that urban populations were less likely to experience a recent decrease in effective population size than rural ones. In addition, we found little genetic structure among populations both globally and between urban and rural populations, which showed extensive gene flow between habitats. Interestingly, white clover displayed overall higher gene flow within urban areas than within rural habitats. Our study provides one of the largest comprehensive tests of demographic effects of urbanization and our results contrast the common perception that heavily altered and fragmented urban environments will reduce the effective population size and genetic diversity of populations and contribute to their isolation.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Inconsistent effects of urbanization on amphibian genetic diversity 96%
- Environmental correlates of genetic variation in the invasive and largely panmictic European starling in North America 96%
- Genomic and phenotypic divergence unveil microgeographic adaptation in the Amazonian hyperdominant tree Eperua falcata Aubl. (Fabaceae) 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic and common garden approaches yield complementary results for quantifying environmental drivers of local adaptation in rubber rabbitbrush, a foundational Great Basin shrub 96%
- Spatial population genetics in heavily managed species: Separating patterns of historical translocation from contemporary gene flow in white-tailed deer 95%
- Chronosequence of invasion reveals minimal losses of population genomic diversity, niche expansion, and trait divergence in the polyploid, leafy spurge. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Panmixia across elevation in thermally sensitive Andean dung beetles 95%
- Evolutionary history of an Alpine archaeognath(Machilis pallida) - insights from different variant types 94%
- Covering the bases: population genomic structure of Lemna minor and the cryptic species L. japonica in Switzerland 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cities as evolutionary incubators for the global spread of the Spotted Lanternfly 96%
- Large genetic divergence underpins cryptic local adaptation across ecological and evolutionary gradients 95%
- RADseq data reveal a lack of admixture in a mouse lemur contact zone contrary to previous microsatellite results 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.