Back

Protective effects of sacubitril/valsartan in anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lopez-Trejo, F. I.; Sanchez-Barrera, M. D.; Andrade-Cuellar, E. N.; Morales-Portano, J. D.; Martinez-Martinez, L. A.

2023-08-17 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.08.14.23294099 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOne of the adverse effects of anthracycline use is cardiotoxicity manifested as heart failure. The benefit of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure of ischemic origin has been demonstrated, but not due to toxicity. Our objective was to determine if there are protective effects of the use of sacubitril/valsartan in cardiotoxicity induced by anthracyclines. MethodsA bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, LILACS, Scopus, EBSCO and Google Scholar. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals following the PRISMA Statement. Results558 published articles were found, of which three were submitted to analysis, with a total sample of 69 patients. With the use of sacubitril/valsartan there was an increase in the percentage of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [MD 6.78% (p < 0.001)], an increase in the percentage of global longitudinal strain of the left ventricle (LV-GLS) [MD 3.37 % (p < 0.001)], and decreased serum levels of NT-proBNP [MD -1003.64 pg/mL (p < 0.001)]; in addition, there was an increase in the distance traveled with the use of sacubitril/valsartan [MD 95.23 meters (p < 0.001)] compared to their baseline values, respectively. ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests that there is a benefit from the use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure related to the use of anthracyclines on ventricular remodeling and functional capacity. This is the first meta-analysis to our knowledge evaluating this effect. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.