Back

The plasma proteome of plant-based diets: analyses of 1463 proteins in 50,000 people

Tong, T. Y.; Smith-Byrne, K.; Papier, K.; Atkins, J. R.; Parsaeian, M.; Key, T. J.; Travis, R. C.

2023-08-16 nutrition
10.1101/2023.08.14.23294084 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background & AimsCirculating proteins are integral to many biological processes and could be influenced by diet. We aimed to assess differences in the plasma proteome between people of different dietary groups, defined by degree of animal food consumption. MethodsThe UK Biobank recruited middle-aged adults (mostly 40 to 69 years) throughout the UK between 2006-2010. Relative concentrations of 2920 plasma proteins were quantified using the Olink Proximity Extension Assay on blood samples from 49,615 participants, who were also asked to report their ethnicity and consumption of red and processed meat, poultry, fish, dairy and eggs. We defined six diet groups among the white British participants (23,243 regular meat eaters, 23,472 low meat eaters, 486 poultry eaters, 1081 fish eaters, 721 vegetarians, and 54 vegans), and two diet groups among the British Indians (391 meat eaters and 167 vegetarians). We used multivariable-adjusted linear regressions to assess the cross-sectional differences in protein concentrations between diet groups, with correction for multiple testing. ResultsWe observed significant differences in many plasma proteins by diet group (920 proteins in white British participants, 2 in British Indians). Of the biggest differences, compared with regular meat eaters, the non-meat eaters had significantly higher FGF21 (e.g. +0.40 SD in vegetarians), CKB (+0.34), GUCA2A (+0.33), FOLR1 (+0.32), IGFBP2 (+0.31) and DSG2 (+0.30); all groups except the vegans had lower HAVCR1 (-0.38 in vegetarians). Vegetarians also had significantly lower SELENOP (-0.46), while the vegans had lower FGFBP2 (-0.68). The observed differences were generally similar in direction in both ethnicities. ConclusionsIn this first comprehensive assessment of plasma proteins by diet group, we identified many differences in proteins between vegetarians, vegans and meat eaters; this variation in protein levels suggests differences in various biological activities, including gastrointestinal tract and kidney function, which may relate to differences in future disease risk.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
7
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
9
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
Food & Function
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
11
The Journal of Nutrition
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
13
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
14
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
19
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
22
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%