A Systematic Background Check of TRICARE Provider Names
Bychkov, D.
Show abstract
During Covid-19, the Defense Health Agencys TRICARE insurance plan expanded its coverage to include 30.1% additional civilian healthcare providers. The DHAs Annual Report, however, states that TRICAREs provider directories are only 80% accurate. Although the DHAs 9.6 million beneficiaries need expanded access to care, they also require protection from misleading information, medical fraud, patient abuse, and identity theft. Since 2013, the Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General has excluded 17,706 physicians from federal health programs due to misconduct. Patients who receive care from excluded providers experience worse medical outcomes. To determine if any excluded provider names were found on TRICAREs website, we performed background checks on TRICARE Wests healthcare provider directory between January 1 and March 2023. Out of 39,463 provider names sampled from 22 states, there were 2,398 matches (6.08%) with individuals and businesses found in the OIG List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (OIG-LEIE), the GSA-SAM, the HHS HIPAA Breach Report, the International Trade Administrations Consolidated Screening List, the OIG-HHS Fugitive List, the FBIs January 6th Capitol Violence List of Charged Defendants, State Medicaid Exclusion Lists, and FDA Debarment Lists. Our study includes demographic analysis of the matching names and recommendations for an Insider Threat Management model. We recommend that DHA officials publish the National Provider Identification (NPI) numbers of all TRICARE providers. NPI numbers facilitate more accurate background checks of healthcare providers.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 Second Wave on Healthcare Networks in the United States 92%
- EMS injury cause codes more accurate than emergency department visit ICD-10-CM codes for firearm injury intent in North Carolina 92%
- The Effect of Stay-at-Home Orders on COVID-19 Cases and Fatalities in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Measurement Matters: Changing Penalty Calculations under the Hospital Acquired Condition Reduction Program (HACRP) Cost Hospitals Millions 91%
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 90%
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Barriers to Implementing Select Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions to Reduce the Transmission of Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2019 91%
- Implementation of SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody infusion sites at three medical centers in the United States: Strengths and challenges assessment to inform COVID-19 pandemic and future public health emergency use 91%
- Correction in Active Cases Data of COVID-19 for the US States by Analytical study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies to Estimate Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Texas Vulnerable Population: Results from Phase I of the Texas Coronavirus Antibody REsponse Survey (TX CARES) 91%
- Serious Workplace Violence against healthcare providers in China in the past 15 years 90%
- COVID-19 critical care simulations: An international cross-sectional survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 90%
- Challenges in Implementing a Mobile AI Chatbot Intervention for Depression Among Youth on Psychiatric Waiting Lists: A Randomized Control Study Termination Report 89%
- Representing Physician Suicide Claims as Nanopublications 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.