Back

Overexpression of tomato SlBBX16 and SlBBX17 impacts fruit development and GA biosynthesis

Dusi, V.; Pennisi, F.; Fortini, D.; Atares, A.; Wenkel, S.; Molesini, B.; Pandolfini, T.

2023-08-13 plant biology
10.1101/2023.08.12.553068 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BBXs are B-Box zinc finger proteins that can act as transcription factors and regulators of protein complexes. Several BBX proteins play important roles in plant development. Two Arabidopsis thaliana microProteins belonging to the BBX family, named miP1a and miP1b, homotypically interact with and modulate the activity of other BBX proteins, including CONSTANS, which transcriptionally activates the florigen, FLOWERING LOCUS T. In tomato, the closest homologs of miP1a and miP1b are the microProteins SlBBX16 and SlBBX17. To deepen our understanding of the role of tomato microProteins in flowering, we constitutively expressed SlBBX16/17 in Arabidopsis and tomato and examined possible interacting partners. Overexpression of the two tomato microProteins in Arabidopsis caused a delay in the flowering transition; however, the effect was weaker than that observed in Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the native miP1a/b. In tomato, overexpression of SlBBX17 prolonged the flowering period; this effect was accompanied by downregulation of the flowering inhibitors Self Pruning (SP) and SP5G. SlBBX16 and SlBBX17 are able to hetero-oligomerize with TCMP-2, a cystine-knot peptide involved in flowering pattern and fruit development in tomato. Increasing the expression of both tomato microProteins also caused alterations in fruit development: overexpression of SlBBX17 resulted in a diminished number and size of ripe fruits as compared to WT plants, while overexpression of SlBBX16 caused delayed fruit production up to the breaker stage. These effects were associated with changes in the expression of genes regulating gibberellin content.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.