Back

Distribution and extent of suitable habitat for geladas (Theropithecus gelada) in the Anthropocene

AHMED, A. S.; Chala, D.; Kufa, C. A.; Atickem, A.; Simegn, A. B.; Svenning, J.-C.; Zinner, D.

2023-08-14 ecology
10.1101/2023.08.10.552774 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClimate change coupled with other anthropogenic pressures may affect species distributions, often causing extinctions at different scales. This is particularly true for species occupying marginal habitats such as gelada, Theropithecus gelada. Our study aimed to model the impact of climate change on the distribution of suitable habitats for geladas and draw conservation implications. Our modelling was based on 285 presence locations of geladas, covering their complete current distribution. We used different techniques to generate pseudoabsence datasets, MaxEnt model complexities, and cut-off thresholds to map the potential distribution of gelada under current and future climates (2050 and 2070). We assembled maps from these techniques to produce a final composite map. We also evaluated the change in the topographic features of gelada over the past 200 years by comparing the topography in current and historical settings. ResultsAll model runs had high performances, AUC = 0.87 - 0.96. Under the current climate, the suitable habitat predicted with high certainty was 90,891 km2, but it decreased remarkably under future climates, -36% by 2050 and -52% by 2070. Whereas no remarkable range shift was predicted under future climates, currently geladas are confined to higher altitudes and complex landscapes compared to historical sightings, probably qualifying geladas as refugee species. ConclusionsOur findings indicated that climate change most likely results in a loss of suitable habitat for geladas, particularly south of the Rift Valley. The difference in topography between current and historical sightings is potentially associated with anthropogenic pressures that drove niche truncation to higher altitudes, undermining the climatic and topographic niche our models predicted. We recommend protecting the current habitats of geladas even when they are forecasted to become climatically unsuitable in the future, in particular for the population south of the Rift Valley.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 5%
30.6%
2
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.2%
4
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
7
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
8
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
9
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
10
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
14
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
20
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%
23
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
24
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%