Back

Uumarrty: Agent Based Simulation Model of Predator Prey Interactions with a Game Theoretical Framework

Remington, M.; Clark, R. w.; Hanscom, R.; Higham, T. E.; Sukumaran, J.

2023-08-12 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2023.08.09.552686 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This paper introduces a new simulation framework for testing hypotheses relating to behavior strategies in predator-prey systems. To this end, we present two tools for simulating and analyzing behavioral trait dynamics: The Nash Score, a novel metric for evaluating evolutionary stability, and Uumarrty, an agent-based framework for simulating predator-prey interactions using game theory. These tools provide an approach for assessing the temporal co-evolution of behavioral traits within agent-based models, with a particular focus on predator-prey dynamics, though the framework is generalizable to other ecological interactions. The Nash Score functions as an analog to the Evolutionarily Stable Strategy (ESS) from classical game theory, offering a quantitative index to assess the relative stability and resilience of behavioral traits under selection. We demonstrate the utility of these tools through a case study on the microhabitat preferences of kangaroo rats and rattlesnakes. Specifically, we explore the emergence and stability of optimal strategies across scenarios with: (1) heterogeneous energy yields among microhabitats, (2) differential strike success rates by microhabitat, and (3) the presence of a specialist predator. Our results highlight how microhabitat specialist predators can drive other predators in the system to specialize due to outcompeting generalists at a given population frequency; leading to behavioral strategy stability in the system. Our case studies also show how behavioral trait dynamics can greatly vary depending on if you treat the trait as a pure strategy versus a mixed strategy. Collectively, this framework enhances our ability to explore ecological and evolutionary responses to environmental change, supporting more robust and comparable simulation-based research in eco-evolutionary dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.