Bridging stimulus generalization and representation learningvia rational dimensionality reduction
Neugebauer, L. M.; Büchel, C.
Show abstract
Generalization, the transfer of knowledge to novel situations, has been studied in distinct disciplines that focus on different aspects. Here we propose a Bayesian model that assumes an exponential mapping from psychological space to outcome probabilities. This model is applicable to probabilistic reinforcement and integrates representation learning by tracking the relevance of stimulus dimensions. Since the belief state about this mapping is dependent on prior knowledge, we designed three experiments that emphasized this aspect. In all studies, we found behavior to be influenced by prior knowledge in a way that is consistent with the model. In line with the literature on representation learning, we found the representational geometry in the middle frontal gyrus to correspond to the behavioral preference for one over the other stimulus dimension and to be updated as predicted by the model. We interpret these findings as support for a common mechanism of generalization.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Novelty is not Surprise: Human exploratory and adaptive behavior in sequential decision-making 96%
- Neural signatures of arbitration between Pavlovian and instrumental action selection 96%
- Hippocampal and medial prefrontal cortices encode structural task representations following progressive and interleaved training schedules 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A machine learning based approach towards high-dimensional mediation analysis 95%
- Asymmetric representation of aversive prediction errors in Pavlovian threat conditioning 95%
- Arbitration between insula and temporoparietal junction subserves framing-induced boosts in generosity during social discounting 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.