Atrial Fibrillation screening in High-Risk patients using a single lead ECG device: A tertiary hospital experience
Aklilu, T. B.; Kebede, M. A.; Mekonnen, D.; Asrat, Y. B.; Petros, A. S.; Mekonnen, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundAtrial Fibrillation (AF) is a major public health problem and one of the commonest supraventricular arrhythmias. At least 20% of all strokes are directly attributable to AF. However, its burden is not clear in sub-Saharan Africa, possibly due in part to undervaluation and non-recognition. In recent decades several new devices have been developed for the betterment of the accuracy and rates of AF detection, which also offers flexibility and feasibility. ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to identify the prevalence of known and Unknown AF in a high-risk patient population using a validated single-lead ECG. Methods and materialsAn institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 410 adults ([≥]55 years) recruited from Tikur Anbessa hospital sub-specialty outpatient clinics from July to October 2021. ECG tracing was conducted using (AliveCor) SL ECG device. A standardized questionnaire was designed to collect socio-demographic and clinical information using ODK Collect v2021. 3.0. we used logistic regression to determine the potential associated factors. ResultsThe overall prevalence of AF in our study was 4.8%. It was strongly associated with age, diagnosis of heart failure, Substance use and high monthly income according to World Bank (WB) category. All the newly diagnosed patients were not on anticoagulation for stroke prevention. Conclusion and RecommendationsSingle timepoint screening in high-risk patients identified previously unknown AF in 2.1 %, out of which the majority were eligible for anticoagulation therapy. Identification of AF through targeted screening with up incoming novel technologies could reduce the stroke burden associated with undiagnosed AF.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 95%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 95%
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgical strategy for atrial functional mitral regurgitation with atrial fibrillation 96%
- Smartwatch Facilitated Remote Health Care for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Amid COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- An International Longitudinal Natural History Study of Danon Disease Patients: Unique Cardiac Trajectories Identified Based on Sex and Heart Failure Outcomes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 96%
- Sex and racial differences in cardiovascular disease risk in patients with atrial fibrillation 95%
- Comparison of WHO laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk Charts among Hypertensive Adults Attending Primary Healthcare Centers in West Africa Sub-region 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of transseptal puncture location on the fossa ovalis on first-pass pulmonary vein isolation 95%
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry 95%
- Associations between biomarkers and p-wave indices in relation to atrial fibrillation development in heart failure patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrocardiographic Abnormalities and Troponin Elevation in COVID-19 96%
- Mid-term subclinical myocardial injury detection in patients recovered from COVID-19 according pulmonary lesion severity 94%
- Fragmented QRS is independently predictive of long-term adverse clinical outcomes in Asian patients hospitalized for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.