Back

The effect of sepsis recognition on telemedicine use and bundle completion in rural emergency department sepsis treatment

Kaldjian, A. M.; Vakkalanka, J. P.; Okoro, U.; Wymore, C.; Harland, K. K.; Campbell, K.; Swanson, M. B.; Fuller, B. M.; Faine, B.; Zepeski, A.; Parker, E. A.; Mack, L.; Bell, A.; DeJong, K.; Wallace, K.; Mueller, K.; Chrischilles, E.; Carpenter, C. R.; Jones, M. P.; Ward, M. M.; Mohr, N. M.

2023-08-13 emergency medicine
10.1101/2023.08.09.23293892 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeProvider-to-provider emergency department telehealth (tele-ED) has been proposed to improve rural sepsis care. The objective of this study was to measure the association between sepsis documentation and tele-ED use, treatment guideline adherence, and mortality. Materials and MethodsThis analysis was a multicenter (n=23) cohort study of sepsis patients treated in rural emergency departments (EDs) that participated in a tele-ED network between August 2016 and June 2019. The primary exposure was whether sepsis was recognized in the local ED, and the primary outcome was rural tele-ED use, with secondary outcomes of time to tele-ED use, 3-hour guideline adherence, and in-hospital mortality. ResultsData from 1,146 rural sepsis patients were included, 315 (27%) had tele-ED used, and 415 (36%) had sepsis recognized in the rural ED. Sepsis recognition was not independently associated with higher rates of tele-ED use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.23, 95% CI 0.90-1.67). Sepsis recognition was associated with earlier tele-ED activation (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.69, 95% CI 1.34-2.13), lower 3-hour guideline adherence (aOR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55-0.97), and lower in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97). ConclusionsSepsis recognition in rural EDs participating in a tele-ED network was not associated with tele-ED use.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.