Back

Effect of regional deprivation on mental and physical health: a longitudinal natural experiment among refugees in Germany

Biddle, L.; Bozorgmehr, K.

2023-08-13 public and global health
10.1101/2023.08.09.23293755 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExisting studies on contextual health effects struggle to account for selection bias, limiting causal interpretation. We use refugee dispersal in Germany as natural experiment to study the effect of small-area deprivation on mental and physical health, while considering the potential mediating role of housing and social context. MethodsRefugees subject to dispersal (n=1400) are selected from a nation-wide longitudinal refugee study (IAB-SOEP-BAMF Panel; 2016-2018). Multi-level linear regression models, adjusted for age, sex, education, region of origin, federal state, asylum status and length of residence in Germany, are fitted to the change in mental and physical health subscales of the SF-12 depending on quintiles (Q1 - Q5) of district-level socioeconomic deprivation (German Index of Socio-Economic Deprivation, GISD). This is followed by mediation analyses (for housing and social context) and sensitivity analyses. FindingsResidency in districts with moderate-high deprivation (Q4) has a negative impact on physical health (coef{middle dot}: -2{middle dot}2, 95%CI: -4{middle dot}1;-0{middle dot}2) compared to lowest deprivation (Q1). Moderate-high deprivation (Q4) also has a positive impact on mental health, but the effect is statistically insignificant following covariate adjustment (coef{middle dot}: 2{middle dot}5, 95%CI: -0{middle dot}7;5{middle dot}6). Comparisons with other deprivation quintiles are statistically insignificant. InterpretationThe results point to gaps in health and social service provision for refugees living in the most deprived regions. Further efforts should be made to support integration of refugees into health and social systems in resource-poor regions, including improved interpreting services, specifically trained social workers and diversity-sensitive information offerings. Further research using longer timeframes and larger sample sizes are required to confirm results. FundingGerman Science Foundation (FOR: 2928/ GZ: BO5233/1-1).

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.5%
2
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
7
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
13
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
15
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
30
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%