Within-host evolution of SARS-CoV-2: how often are mutations transmitted?
Korosec, C. S.; Wahl, L. M.; Heffernan, J. M.
Show abstract
Despite a relatively low mutation rate, the large number of SARS-CoV-2 infections has allowed for substantial genetic change, leading to a multitude of emerging variants. Using a recently determined mutation rate (per site replication), as well as parameter estimates for within-host SARS-CoV-2 infection, we apply a stochastic transmission-bottleneck model to describe the survival probability of de novo SARS-CoV-2 mutations. For narrow bottlenecks, we find mutations affecting pertarget-cell attachment rate (with phenotypes associated with fusogenicity and ACE2 binding), have similar transmission probabilities to mutations affecting viral load clearance (with phenotypes associated with humoral evasion). We further find that mutations affecting the eclipse rate (with phenotypes associated with reorganization of cellular metabolic processes and synthesis of viral budding precursor material) are highly favoured relative to all other traits examined. We find mutations leading to reduced removal rates of infected cells (with phenotypes associated with innate immune evasion) have limited transmission advantage relative to mutations leading to humoral evasion. Predicted transmission probabilities, however, for mutations affecting innate immune evasion are more consistent with the range of clinically-estimated household transmission probabilities for de novo mutations. This result suggests that although mutations affecting humoral evasion are more easily transmitted when they occur, mutations affecting innate immune evasion may occur more readily. We examine our predictions in the context of a number of previously characterized mutations in circulating strains of SARS-CoV-2. Our work offers both a null model for SARS-CoV-2 substitution rates and predicts which aspects of viral life history are most likely to successfully evolve, despite low mutation rates and repeated transmission bottlenecks.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Why are viral genomes so fragile? The bottleneck hypothesis 97%
- Attenuation of HIV severity by slightly deleterious mutations can explain the long-term trajectory of virulence evolution. 97%
- Phenotypic delay in the evolution of bacterial antibiotic resistance: mechanistic models and their implications 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Life cycle process dependencies of positive-sense RNA viruses suggest strategies for inhibiting productive cellular infection 97%
- Role of high-dose exposure in transmission hot zones as a driver of SARS-CoV2 dynamics 96%
- Eco-evolutionary dynamics of pathogen immune-escape: deriving a population-level phylodynamic curve 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Lag Is a Major Cost of Prokaryotic Adaptive Immunity During Viral Outbreaks 97%
- Autocrine and paracrine interferon signaling as ‘ring vaccination’ and ‘contact tracing’ strategies to suppress virus infection in a host 96%
- The origin of the central dogma through conflicting multilevel selection 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.