Auditory cortical error signals retune during songbird courtship
Jones, C. B.; Goldberg, J. H.
Show abstract
Auditory feedback is important for vocal learning and control, but it remains unclear how the presence of an audience affects neural representations of self-produced sounds. Here we recorded neural activity in a primary auditory cortical area, Field L, in zebra finches practicing singing alone and directing courtship songs to females. We first discovered that many Field L neurons changed their singing-related discharge patterns during courtship singing, even though the auditory feedback from the birds own song was similar. We next used syllable-targeted distorted auditory feedback (DAF) to test how auditory error signals depend on courtship context. Though past work showed that dopamine neurons uniformly reduce error signaling during courtship, Field L neurons exhibited heterogeneous error signal re-tuning in the presence of the female. Thus, single neurons in a primary sensory area process feedback from self-produced actions differently during practice and performance.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Network Organization for Courtship Song Feature Detection in Drosophila 97%
- Functional and ultrastructural analysis of reafferent mechanosensation in larval zebrafish 95%
- Multisensory integration of social signals by a pathway from the basal amygdala to the auditory cortex in maternal mice 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Expression of FoxP2 in the Basal Ganglia Regulates Vocal Motor Sequences in the Adult Songbird 95%
- Distinct information conveyed to the olfactory bulb by feedforward input from the nose and feedback from the cortex 95%
- Continuous multiplexed population representations of task context in the mouse primary visual cortex 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.