Back

Neolactotetraosylceramide: A novel non-invasive urinary biomarker for bladder cancer

Moreira, I. B.; Rossdam, C.; Beimdiek, J.; Vicente, M. M.; Schmitz, J.; Oberbeck, A.; Braesen, J. H.; Tezval, H.; Buettner, F. F. R.

2023-08-11 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.08.08.552442 bioRxiv
Show abstract

There is an urgent need to identify noninvasive biomarkers for bladder cancer. Here, we applied glycan analytics by multiplex capillary gel electrophoresis coupled to laser-induced fluorescence detection (xCGE-LIF) to unravel the global glycosphingolipid (GSL)-glycan profile of primary tumor tissues and urine samples from bladder cancer patients. Thereby, we detected neolactotetraosylceramide (Gal{beta}1-4GlcNAc{beta}1-3Gal{beta}1-4Glc-Cer, nLc4) at significantly increased levels from tumorigenic regions of bladder tissues compared to non-malignant adjacent material (n = 30). Specific expression of nLc4 in cancer tissue was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining. GSL-glycan profiling by xCGE-LIF of urinary exosomes showed that nLc4 is increased in bladder cancer patients (n = 16) when compared to controls (n = 50), with an overall sensitivity of 57% and specificity of 90%. We set-up an ELISA targeting nLc4-containing urinary exosomes from bladder cancer patients (n = 9) and cancer-free individuals (n = 9) demonstrating an overall sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 78%, respectively. SIGNFICANCEThis study shows that levels of nLc4 are significantly elevated in bladder cancer tissue and urinary exosomes of bladder cancer patients. Urinary detection of nLc4 by glycan analytics or ELISA outperforms standard diagnostic modalities, facilitating noninvasive bladder cancer diagnosis. Furthermore, nLc4 bears the potential of being a target for bladder cancer therapy.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.