Back

Pulmonary Artery Pressures and Mortality during VA ECMO: An ELSO Registry Analysis

Owyang, C. G.; Rippon, B.; Teran, F.; Brodie, D.; Araos, J. D.; Burkhoff, D.; Kim, J.; Tonna, J. E.

2023-08-15 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2023.08.08.23293859 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSystemic hemodynamics and specific ventilator settings have been shown to predict survival during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO). While these factors are intertwined with right ventricular (RV) function, the independent relationship between RV function and survival during VA ECMO is unknown. ObjectivesTo identify the relationship between RV function with mortality and duration of ECMO support. MethodsCardiac ECMO runs in adults from the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry between 2010 and 2022 were queried. RV function was quantified via pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PAPP) for pre-ECMO and on-ECMO periods. A multivariable model was adjusted for Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) stage, age, gender, and concurrent clinical data (i.e., pulmonary vasodilators and systemic pulse pressure). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. ResultsA total of 4,442 ECMO runs met inclusion criteria and had documentation of hemodynamic and illness severity variables. The mortality rate was 55%; non-survivors were more likely to be older, have a worse SCAI stage, and have longer pre-ECMO endotracheal intubation times (P < 0.05 for all) than survivors. Improving PAPP from pre-ECMO to on-ECMO time ({Delta} PAPP) was associated with reduced mortality per 10 mm Hg increase (OR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.86-0.96]; P=0.002). Increasing on-ECMO PAPP was associated with longer time on ECMO per 10 mm Hg (Beta: 15 [95% CI: 7.7-21]; P<0.001). ConclusionsEarly improvements in RV function from pre-ECMO values were associated with mortality reduction during cardiac ECMO. Incorporation of {Delta} PAPP into risk prediction models should be considered.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.5%
2
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
7
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.5%
8
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
14
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
17
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
18
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%