Study Protocol for the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standards (ICARUS) Global Cross-Specialty Surveys Among Surgeons, Anesthesiologists, Nurses, Interventional Cardiologists, and Interventional Radiologists
Cacciamani, G. E.; Sholklapper, T.; Eppler, M. B.; Sayegh, A.; Storino Ramacciotti, L.; Abreu, A. L.; Sotelo, R.; Desai, M. M.; Gill, I. S.
Show abstract
Every year, approximately 200 million surgeries are performed worldwide, and intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) have a significant impact on patients and surgeons. Despite their importance, the true scale of iAEs remains underestimated due to inadequate methods for assessment, collection, grading, and reporting. Various grading systems have been introduced over the past decade, but their adoption has been limited, leading to inconsistencies in reporting. Furthermore, a lack of standardized frameworks for defining, assessing, and collecting iAEs, coupled with litigation concerns, contributes to underreporting. Only half of surgery and anesthesiology journals provide guidance on reporting perioperative adverse events, and recommendations for reporting iAEs are notably lacking in surgical literature. To address these issues, the Intraoperative Complications Assessment and Reporting with Universal Standard (ICARUS) Global Surgical Collaboration was established in 2022. The initiative involves conducting global surveys and a Delphi consensus to understand the barriers for poor reporting of iAEs, validate shared criteria for reporting, define iAEs according to surgical procedures, evaluate the existing grading systems reliability, and identify strategies for enhancing the collection, reporting, and management of iAEs. A sample size of 2,398 respondents was calculated for the study, with invitations extended to 86,574 healthcare providers. This effort represents an essential step towards improved patient safety and the well-being of healthcare professionals in the surgical field.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between epidural catheter tip malposition and anesthesiologists’ experience after graduation: a cross-sectional study using postoperative CT images 95%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 95%
- Perioperative mortality in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: Protocol for a multi-level meta-regression analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 94%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 94%
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk Factor Stratification for Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Database Study 93%
- Modified Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound Technique Versus Conventional Palpation Technique For Radial Arterial Cannulation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial 90%
- The PBL teaching method in Neurology Education in the Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduate students: An Observational Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interventions To Improve Patient Safety During The COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review 90%
- A mixed methods study of attitudes on location of gynaecological oncology outpatient care: a patient and healthcare professional questionnaire 89%
- “We tend to get pad happy” : a qualitative study of health practitioners’ perspectives on continence care for older people in hospital 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.