A Novel Simulation Framework for Validation of Ecological Network Inference
Kusch, E.; Vinton, A. C.
Show abstract
O_LIUnderstanding how the differential magnitude and sign of ecological interactions vary across space is vital to assessing ecosystem resilience to biodiversity loss and predict community assemblies. This necessity for ecological network knowledge and their labour-intensive sampling requirements has spurred the creation of ecological network inference methodology. Recent research has identified inconsistencies in networks inferred using different approaches thus necessitating quantification of inference performance to facilitate choice of network inference approach. C_LIO_LIHere we develop a data simulation method to generate data products fit for network inference and subsequently quantify the validity of two well-established ecological interaction network inference methods - HMSC and COOCCUR. The simulation framework we present here can be parameterised using real-world information (e.g., biological interactions observed in-situ and bioclimatic niche preferences) thus representing network inference capabilities in real-world applications. Using this framework, it is thus possible to evaluate the performance of any ecological network inference approach. C_LIO_LIWe identify a concerningly large range in accuracy of inferred networks as compared to true, realisable association networks. These differences in inference accuracy are governed by a paradigm of input data types and environmental parameter estimation as previously suggested. To establish a workflow for quantification of network inference reliability, we suggest analysis procedures with which to explore inference and detection probabilities of association types of different identity and sign with respect to bioclimatic niche preferences and association strength of association partner-species. C_LIO_LIWith this study, we provide the groundwork with which to validate and compare ecological network inference methods, and ultimately vastly increase our ability to understand and predict species biodiversity across space and time. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying flow modules in ecological networks using Infomap 96%
- NetworkExtinction: an R package to simulate extinction's propagation and rewiring potential in ecological networks 95%
- EcologicalNetworksDynamics.jl: A Julia package to simulate the temporal dynamics of complex ecological networks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Linear-regression-based algorithms can succeed at identifying microbial functional groups despite the nonlinearity of ecological function 92%
- Competition for resources can reshape the evolutionary properties of spatial structure 92%
- Accuracy of the Lotka-Volterra Model fails in strongly coupled microbial consumer-resource systems 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Matching the forecast horizon with the relevant spatial and temporal processes and data sources 96%
- The what, how and why of trait-based analyses in ecology 95%
- RangeShifter 2.0: An extended and enhanced platform for modelling spatial eco-evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A unified model of species abundance, genetic diversity, and functional diversity revealsthe mechanisms structuring ecological communities 96%
- Estimation of spatial demographic maps from polymorphism data using a neural network 94%
- The WZA: A window-based method for characterizing genotype-environment association 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.