Back

Differential substrate affinity and catabolite repression enable preferential use of urea by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria

Qin, W.; Wei, S. P.; Zheng, Y.; Choi, E.; Li, X.; Johnston, J.; Wan, X.; Abrahamson, B.; Flinkstrom, Z.; Wang, B.; Li, H.; Hou, L.; Tao, Q.; Chlouber, W. W.; Sun, X.; Wells, M.; Ngo, L.; Hunt, K. A.; Urakawa, H.; Tao, X.; Wang, D.; Pan, C.; Weber, P. K.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Stahl, D. A.; Ward, B. B.; Mayali, X.; Martens-Habbena, W.; Winkler, M.

2023-08-04 microbiology
10.1101/2023.08.04.551995 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Four distinct lineages of ammonia-oxidizing microorganisms (AOM) collectively contribute to one of the largest nitrogen fluxes in the global nitrogen budget. AOM possess widely different specific affinities for ammonia, thought to determine their niche differentiation. Nevertheless, ammonia-oxidizing archaea and bacteria (AOA, AOB), and complete ammonia oxidizers (comammox) co-occur in soils, freshwater sediments, and aquifers, suggesting that other factors must drive their coexistence. Here, we show that representatives of four AOM lineages employ distinct regulatory strategies for ammonia or urea utilization, thereby minimizing direct competition for either substrate. The tested AOA and comammox species preferentially used ammonia over urea, while beta-proteobacterial AOB favored urea utilization, repressed ammonia transport in the presence of urea, and showed higher affinity for urea than ammonia, whereas gamma-proteobacterial AOB co-utilized both substrates. Stable isotope tracing, kinetics, and transcriptomics experiments revealed that both assimilation and oxidation of ammonia are transport-dependent. These results reveal novel mechanisms of nitrogen metabolism regulation and transporter-based affinity underlying the contrasting niche adaptation and coexistence patterns among the major AOM lineages.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.