Back

Label-free citrate-stabilized silver nanoparticles-based highly sensitive, cost-effective and rapid visual method for differential detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis

Patnaik, N.; Dey, R. J.

2023-08-04 microbiology
10.1101/2023.08.04.551932 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tuberculosis poses a global health challenge, demanding improved diagnostics and therapies. Distinguishing between Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb) and Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) infections holds critical "One Health" significance due to zoonotic nature of these infections and inherent resistance of M. bovis to pyrazinamide, a key part of Directly Observed Treatment, Short-course (DOTS) regimen. Furthermore, most of the currently used molecular detection methods fail to distinguish between the two species. To address this, our study presents an innovative molecular-biosensing strategy. We developed a label-free citrate-stabilized silver nanoparticle aggregation assay, offering sensitive, cost-effective, and swift detection. For molecular detection, genomic markers unique to M. tb and M. bovis were targeted using species-specific primers. In addition to amplifying species-specific regions, these primers also aid detection of characteristic deletions in each of the mycobacterial species. Post polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we compared two highly sensitive visual detection methods with respect to the traditional agarose gel electrophoresis. The paramagnetic bead-based bridging flocculation assay, successfully discriminates M. tb from M. bovis with a sensitivity of ~40 bacilli. The second strategy exploits citrate-stabilized silver nanoparticle which aggregates in the absence of amplified dsDNA on addition of sodium chloride (NaCl). This technique enables precise, sensitive and differential detection of as few as ~4 bacilli. Our study hence advances tuberculosis detection, overcoming challenges of M. tb and M. bovis differentiation offering a quicker alternative to time-consuming methods.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.8%
3
Journal of Microbiological Methods
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
5
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
9
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
10
Talanta
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
14
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Access Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
18
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Journal of Virological Methods
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
Pathogens
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
BioTechniques
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%