Measuring phase-amplitude coupling opposition in neurophysiological signals with the Mean Opposition Vector Index (MOVI)
Saint Amour di Chanaz, L.; Perez Bellido, A.; Fuentemilla, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) opposition between distinct neural oscillations is critical to understanding brain functions. Available methods to assess phase-preference differences between conditions rely on density of occurrences. Other methods like the Kullback-Leibler Divergence (DKL) assess the distance between two conditions by transforming neurophysiological data into probabilistic distributions of phase-preference and assessing the distance between them. However, these methods have limitations such as susceptibility to noise and bias. New MethodWe propose the "Mean Opposition Vector Index" (MOVI), a parameter-free, data-driven algorithm for unbiased estimation of PAC opposition. MOVI establishes a unified framework that integrates the strength of PAC to account for reliable unimodal differences in phase-specific amplitude coupling between neurophysiological datasets. ResultsWe found that MOVI accurately detected phase opposition, was resistant to noise and gave consistent results with low or asymmetrical number of trials, therefore in conditions more similar to experimental studies. Comparison with existing methodsMOVI outperformed Jensen-Shannon Divergence (JSD), an adaptation of the DKL, in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to detect phase opposition. ConclusionsMOVI provides a novel and useful approach to study of phase-preference opposition in neurophysiological datasets.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical Bayesian Inference in Neuroscience: Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Embrace the Distribution 96%
- Different methods to estimate the phase of neural rhythms agree, but only during times of low uncertainty 95%
- Comparing surrogates to evaluate precisely timed higher-order spike correlations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal and spatiotemporal perturbations in paced finger tapping point to a common mechanism for the processing of time errors 94%
- Unravelling individual rhythmic abilities using machine learning 93%
- Change point detection with multiple alternatives reveals parallel evaluation of the same stream of evidence along distinct timescales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptual clustering in auditory streaming 94%
- Time-resolved dynamic computational modeling of human EEG recordings reveals gradients of generative mechanisms for the MMN response 94%
- Capturing the songs of mice with an improved detection and classification method for ultrasonic vocalizations (BootSnap) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Fat tails, fat earnings, fat mistakes: On the need to disclose distribution parameters of qEEG databases 94%
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 93%
- Predictors for Estimating Subcortical EEG Responses to Continuous Speech 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.