Interface-guided phenotyping of coding variants in the transcription factor RUNX1 with SEUSS
Ozturk, K.; Panwala, R.; Sheen, J.; Ford, K.; Payne, N.; Zhang, D.-E.; Hutter, S.; Haferlach, T.; Ideker, T.; Mali, P.; Carter, H.
Show abstract
Understanding the consequences of single amino acid substitutions in cancer driver genes remains an unmet need. Perturb-seq provides a tool to investigate the effects of individual mutations on cellular programs. Here we deploy SEUSS, a Perturb-seq like approach, to generate and assay mutations at physical interfaces of the RUNX1 Runt domain. We measured the impact of 115 mutations on RNA profiles in single myelogenous leukemia cells and used the profiles to categorize mutations into three functionally distinct groups: wild-type (WT)-like, loss-of-function (LOF)-like and hypomorphic. Notably, the largest concentration of functional mutations (non-WT-like) clustered at the DNA binding site and contained many of the more frequently observed mutations in human cancers. Hypomorphic variants shared characteristics with loss of function variants but had gene expression profiles indicative of response to neural growth factor and cytokine recruitment of neutrophils. Additionally, DNA accessibility changes upon perturbations were enriched for RUNX1 binding motifs, particularly near differentially expressed genes. Overall, our work demonstrates the potential of targeting protein interaction interfaces to better define the landscape of prospective phenotypes reachable by amino acid substitutions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer-specific CTCF binding facilitates oncogenic transcriptional dysregulation 96%
- Allele-specific DNA methylation is increased in cancers and its dense mapping in normal plus neoplastic cells increases the yield of disease-associated regulatory SNPs 95%
- Single cell decoding of drug induced transcriptomic reprogramming in triple negative breast cancers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.