Correlative single-cell hard X-ray tomography and X-ray fluorescence imaging
Lin, Z.; Zhang, X.; Nandi, P.; Lin, Y.; Wang, L.; Chu, Y.; Paape, T.; Yang, Y.; Xiao, X.; Liu, Q.
Show abstract
X-ray tomography (XRT) and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) imaging are two non-invasive imaging techniques to study cellular structures and chemical element distributions, respectively. However, correlative X-ray tomography and fluorescence imaging for the same cell have yet to be routinely realized due to challenges in sample preparation and X-ray radiation damage. Here we report an integrated experimental and computational workflow for achieving correlative multi-modality X-ray imaging of a single cell. The method consists of the preparation of radiation-resistant single-cell samples using live-cell imaging-assisted chemical fixation and freeze-drying procedures, targeting and labeling cells for correlative XRT and XRF measurement, and computational reconstruction of the correlative and multi-modality images. With XRT, cellular structures including the overall structure and intracellular organelles are visualized, while XRF imaging reveals the distribution of multiple chemical elements within the same cell. Our correlative method demonstrates the feasibility and broad applicability of using X-rays to understand cellular structures and the roles of chemical elements and related proteins in signaling and other biological processes.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast volumetric fluorescence lifetime imaging of multicellular systems using single-objective light-sheet microscopy 95%
- cryoTIGER: Deep-Learning Based Tilt Interpolation Generator for Enhanced Reconstruction in Cryo Electron Tomography 94%
- High-resolution assessment of multidimensional cellular mechanics using label-free refractive-index traction force microscopy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.