Is your data alignable? Principled and interpretable alignability testing and integration of single-cell data
Ma, R.; Sun, E. D.; Donoho, D.; Zou, J.
Show abstract
Single-cell data integration can provide a comprehensive molecular view of cells, and many algorithms have been developed to remove unwanted technical or biological variations and integrate heterogeneous single-cell datasets. Despite their wide usage, existing methods suffer from several fundamental limitations. In particular, we lack a rigorous statistical test for whether two high-dimensional single-cell datasets are alignable (and therefore should even be aligned). Moreover, popular methods can substantially distort the data during alignment, making the aligned data and downstream analysis difficult to interpret. To overcome these limitations, we present a spectral manifold alignment and inference (SMAI) framework, which enables principled and interpretable alignability testing and structure-preserving integration of single-cell data. SMAI provides a statistical test to robustly determine the alignability between datasets to avoid misleading inference, and is justified by high-dimensional statistical theory. On a diverse range of real and simulated benchmark datasets, it outperforms commonly used alignment methods. Moreover, we show that SMAI improves various downstream analyses such as identification of differentially expressed genes and imputation of single-cell spatial transcriptomics, providing further biological insights. SMAIs interpretability also enables quantification and a deeper understanding of the sources of technical confounders in single-cell data.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- scDesign2: a transparent simulator that generates high-fidelity single-cell gene expression count data with gene correlations captured 97%
- PseudotimeDE: inference of differential gene expression along cell pseudotime with well-calibrated p-values from single-cell RNA sequencing data 97%
- scINSIGHT for interpreting single-cell gene expression from biologically heterogeneous data 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- mcRigor: a statistical method to enhance the rigor of metacell partitioning in single-cell data analysis 97%
- Flexible Experimental Designs for Valid Single-cell RNA-sequencing Experiments Allowing Batch Effects Correction 97%
- FastCCC: A permutation-free framework for scalable, robust, and reference-based cell-cell communication analysis in single cell transcriptomics studies 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Graph Contrastive Learning of Subcellular-resolution Spatial Transcriptomics Improves Cell Type Annotation and Reveals Critical Molecular Pathways 97%
- CosGeneGate Selects Multi-functional and Credible Biomarkers for Single-cell Analysis 96%
- FIRM: Flexible Integration of single-cell RNA-sequencing data for large-scale Multi-tissue cell atlas datasets 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.