Back

Parameters of Cable Theory Are Mostly Unaffected by the Geometry of Dendritic Spines

Eberhardt, F.

2023-08-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2023.08.03.551798 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dendritic spines are extremely small and experimentally difficult to access. Therefore, it is still uncertain whether all assumptions of basic neuroscientific theories, such as cable theory, are valid there. Previous theoretical work suggests that electroneutrality could be violated in dendritic spines. If this were true, new theories would be required. Unfortunately, these results were based on a greatly simplified model system with unrealistic ion concentrations. Inspired by these studies, we apply Poison-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations to study the profiles of ion concentrations and the membrane potential in dendritic spines in a physiologically relevant regime. We find that, for realistic ion concentrations and in contrast to previous results, electroneutrality is a valid assumption for all tested geometries, irrespective of size and shape. However, the surface charge causes an accumulation of counter ions and a strong electric field near the surface of the membrane in the intra- and extracellular space. Still, a plate capacitor model accurately describes the capacitance of the membrane. Most importantly, the two cable parameters - the specific capacitance and the intracellular resistivity - are constants over a wide range of parameters. These results justify the application of models based on cable theory to dendritic spines.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
3
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.4%
4
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
8
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
9
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
10
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
18
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
19
Biological Cybernetics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
25
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
Cell Calcium
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%