Functional Adaptations of Endogenous Retroviruses to the Drosophila Host Underlie their Evolutionary Diversification
Senti, K.-A.; Handler, D.; Rafanel, B.; Kosiol, C.; Schloetterer, C.; Brennecke, J.
Show abstract
Transposable elements profoundly affect the biology and evolution of their hosts, yet their own evolutionary dynamics remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate insect endogenous retroviruses (iERVs), a monophyletic group of LTR retrotransposons that have acquired the trait of infectivity, likely through capture of a Baculovirus envelope gene. In Drosophila ovaries, iERVs with functional envelope have adapted their cis-regulatory sequences to be expressed in any somatic cell type, from where they infect the germline. Strikingly, related retroviruses show distinct expression patterns, indicating niche partitioning. In contrast, all non-infectious iERVs that emerged through secondary envelope-loss are specifically expressed in the germline. Co-evolving with iERVs, the genome-protecting piRNA pathway has assimilated iERV promoter and sequence information into piRNA clusters, underscoring the functional significance of iERV expression in somatic niches. We propose that the evolutionary innovation of cell-to-cell infectivity has triggered the adaptive radiation of iERVs through trait diversification and antagonistic virus-host interactions, processes that likely underpin niche-specific expression of endogenous retroviruses in vertebrates as well.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- DNA methylation enables recurrent endogenization of giant viruses in an animal relative 96%
- RNase L limits host and viral protein synthesis via inhibition of mRNA export 96%
- Structures of vertebrate R2 retrotransposon complexes during target-primed reverse transcription and after second strand nicking 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.