Model-based inference of RNA velocity modules improves cell fate prediction
Aivazidis, A.; Memi, F.; Kleshchevnikov, V.; Clarke, B.; Stegle, O.; Bayraktar, O.
Show abstract
RNA velocity is a powerful paradigm that exploits the temporal information contained in spliced and unspliced RNA counts to infer transcriptional dynamics. Existing velocity models either rely on coarse biophysical simplifications or require extensive numerical approximations to solve the underlying differential equations. This results in loss of accuracy in challenging settings, such as complex or weak transcription rate changes across cellular trajectories. Here, we present cell2fate, a formulation of RNA velocity based on a linearization of the velocity ODE, which allows solving a biophysically accurate model in a fully Bayesian fashion. As a result, cell2fate decomposes the RNA velocity solutions into modules, which provides a new biophysical connection between RNA velocity and statistical dimensionality reduction. We comprehensively benchmark cell2fate in real-world settings, demonstrating enhanced interpretability and increased power to reconstruct complex dynamics and weak dynamical signals in rare and mature cell types. Finally, we apply cell2fate to a newly generated dataset from the developing human brain, where we spatially map RNA velocity modules onto the tissue architecture, thereby connecting the spatial organisation of tissues with temporal dynamics of transcription.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamic network-guided CRISPRi screen reveals CTCF loop-constrained nonlinear enhancer-gene regulatory activity in cell state transitions 96%
- Linking regulatory variants to target genes by integrating single-cell multiome methods and genomic distance 96%
- Impact of Segmentation Errors in Analysis of Spatial Transcriptomics Data. 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.