Back

Endocytosis gated by emergent properties of membrane-clathrin interactions

Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, A.; Padilla, R.; Lee, D. M.; Kim, D.; Mettlen, M.; Chen, Z.; Schmid, S. L.; Danuser, G.

2023-08-03 biophysics
10.1101/2023.08.02.551737 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), the major cellular entry pathway, starts when clathrin assembles on the plasma membrane into clathrin-coated pits (CCPs). Two populations of CCPs are detected within the same cell: productive CCPs that invaginate and pinch off, forming clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs) [1, 2], and abortive CCPs [3, 4, 5] that prematurely disassemble. The mechanisms of gating between these two populations and their relations to the functions of dozens of early-acting endocytic accessory proteins (EAPs) [5, 6, 7, 8, 9] have remained elusive. Here, we use experimentally-guided modeling to integrate the clathrin machinery and membrane mechanics in a single dynamical system. We show that the split between the two populations is an emergent property of this system, in which a switch between an Open state and a Closed state follows from the competition between the chemical energy of the clathrin basket and the mechanical energy of membrane bending. In silico experiments revealed an abrupt transition between the two states that acutely depends on the strength of the clathrin basket. This critical strength is lowered by membrane-bending EAPs [10, 11, 12]. Thus, CME is poised to be shifted between abortive and productive events by small changes in membrane curvature and/or coat stability. This model clarifies the workings of a putative endocytic checkpoint whose existence was previously proposed based on statistical analyses of the lifetime distributions of CCPs [4, 13]. Overall, a mechanistic framework is established to elucidate the diverse and redundant functions of EAPs in regulating CME progression.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.4%
2
Physical Review Letters
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
3
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.2%
5
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.2%
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.9%
10
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 19%
2.5%
11
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.5%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Nature Physics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Communications Physics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
17
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
19
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
21
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
23
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%