Back

Unique T cell signatures are associated with reduced Chlamydia trachomatis reinfection in a highly exposed cohort

Yount, K. S.; Kollipara, A.; Liu, C.; Zheng, X.; O'Connell, C. M.; Bagwell, B.; Wiesenfeld, H. C.; Hillier, S. L.; Darville, T.

2023-08-03 immunology
10.1101/2023.08.02.551709 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection globally. Understanding natural immunity to CT will inform vaccine design. This study aimed to profile immune cells and associated functional features in CT-infected women, and determine immune profiles associated with reduced risk of ascended endometrial CT infection and CT reinfection. PBMCs from CT-exposed women were profiled by mass cytometry and random forest models identified key features that distinguish outcomes. CT+ participants exhibited higher frequencies of CD4+ Th2, Th17, and Th17 DN CD4 T effector memory (TEM) cells than uninfected participants with decreased expression of T cell activation and differentiation markers. No significant differences were detected between women with or without endometrial CT infection. Participants who remained follow-up negative (FU-) showed higher frequencies of CD4 T central memory (TCM) Th1, Th17, Th1/17, and Th17 DN but reduced CD4 TEM Th2 cells than FU+ participants. Expression of markers associated with central memory and Th17 lineage were increased on T cell subsets among FU- participants. These data indicate that peripheral T cells exhibit distinct features associated with resistance to CT reinfection. The highly plastic Th17 lineage appears to contribute to protection. Addressing these immune nuances could promote efficacy of CT vaccines. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=143 SRC="FIGDIR/small/551709v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (57K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1df97e7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6deabcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@4e02d0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@19ae25d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.