Device measured sedentary behaviour, sleep, light and moderate-vigorous physical activity and cardio-metabolic health: A compositional individual participant data analysis in the ProPASS consortium
Ahmadi, M.
Show abstract
Background/AimsPhysical inactivity, sedentary behaviour (SB) and inadequate sleep are key behavioural risk factors of cardiometabolic diseases; each is mainly considered in isolation. The study aim was to investigate associations of five movement behaviour compositions with adiposity and cardiometabolic biomarkers. MethodsCross-sectional data from 15,246 participants from the Prospective Physical Activity, Sitting and Sleep consortium (ProPASS) were analysed. Time spent in sleep, SB, standing, light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) and moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) made up the composition. Outcomes included BMI, waist circumference, HDL cholesterol, total:HDL cholesterol ratio, triglycerides and HbA1c. Compositional linear regression examined associations between compositions and each outcome, including modelling reallocation of time between behaviours. ResultsThe average daily composition of the sample(age:53.7{+/-}9.7years; 54.7%female) was 7.7hrs sleeping,10.4hrs sedentary,3.1hrs standing,1.5hrs LIPA and 1.3hrs MVPA. A greater proportion of MVPA time and smaller proportion of SB time was associated with better outcomes. Reallocating time from SB,standing,LIPA or sleep into MVPA had the largest theoretical improvement across all outcomes. For example, replacing 30min of SB, sleep, standing or LIPA with MVPA was associated with -0.63 (95%CI -0.48,-0.79), -0.43 (-0.25,-0.59), -0.40 (-0.25,-0.56) and -0.15 (0.05,-0.34)kg/m2 lower BMI, respectively. A larger proportion of standing time was beneficial for outcomes; sleep had a detrimental association when replacing LIPA or MVPA and positive association when replacing SB. The minimal displacement into MVPA for improved cardiometabolic health ranged from 3.8 (HbA1c) to 12.7 (triglycerides) min/day. ConclusionsCompositional data analyses revealed a distinct hierarchy of behaviours. MVPA demonstrated the strongest, most time-efficient protective associations with cardiometabolic outcomes. Theoretical benefits from reallocating SB into sleep, standing or LIPA required substantial changes in daily activity.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- New job, new habits? A Multilevel Interrupted Time Series analysis of diet, physical activity and sleep changes among young adults starting work for the first time 95%
- Is occupational physical activity associated with all-cause mortality in UK Biobank? 94%
- Vigorous intermittent lifestyle physical activity (VILPA) and mortality risk among US adults: a wearables-based national cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Descriptive epidemiology of cardiorespiratory fitness in UK adults: The Fenland Study 95%
- Genome-wide association study of liking of physical activity in the UK Biobank 94%
- Physical activity and posture profile of a South African cohort of middle-aged men and women as determined by integrated hip and thigh accelerometry 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations between physical activity and other health behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic: A fixed effects analysis 94%
- A longitudinal causal graph analysis investigating modifiable risk factors and obesity in a European cohort of children and adolescents 93%
- Environment-wide association study (EWAS) on cardiometabolic traits: A systematic assessment of the association of lifestyle variables on a longitudinal setting 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleep Regularity and Mortality: A Prospective Analysis in the UK Biobank 95%
- Serum proteomic profiling of physical activity reveals CD300LG as a novel exerkine with a potential causal link to glucose homeostasis 92%
- What if risk factors influenced the variability of health outcomes as well as the mean? Evidence and implications 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.