Back

The effect of High Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) on pain in Somatic Symptom Disorder with predominant pain (SSD-P): a randomized single-blind sham controlled cross-over study

Kathiravan, S.; Ghosh, A.; Singh, S. M.

2023-08-06 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2023.08.01.23293484 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSomatic Symptom Disorder with predominant pain (SSD-P) is a common disorder with unsatisfactory treatment options. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is useful in chronic pain conditions. ObjectiveTo assess the effect of two within session repeated High Definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) over left motor cortex on pain and other associated variables in SSD-P. MethodsInstitute Ethics Committee approval was sought and the study was registered in the Clinical Trials Registry of India. Single-blind, sham controlled, cross-over study design was employed. Thirty right handed patients with DSM-5 diagnosis of SSD-P, aged 18-60 years, receiving stable treatment were enrolled by consecutive sampling. After simple randomization, two short interval repeated sessions (2mA, 20 minutes each) of either active or sham HD-tDCS was administered followed by a wash out period of seven days and cross over. Assessments were done at baseline, week one and two. Analysis was done using SPSS 21. ResultsParticipants were comparable on all baseline parameters. ANCOVA showed no orderxgroup interaction. On RM-ANOVA all participants irrespective of entering active or sham arm showed statistically significant difference (Cohens d >0.8) in pain and associated parameters like depression, anxiety, pain related interference, burden and disability at week two (p< 0.01). But at week one, this was observed only in active arm. Transient mild local side effects like burning, pain and itching were noted, with no cognitive side effects. ConclusionThis was the first study of HD-tDCS on SSD-P. Single session repeated protocol can be effective in pain reduction with sustained effects up to one week.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.0%
2
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
3
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
6
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
7
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
8
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
9
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
13
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
15
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
16
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Occupational Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
24
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%